Online Secondary Research- UK Female Filmmakers

Warped Women: The Emergence of Female Horror Directors in the UK (Electric Sheep, 2011)

Pretty women meet un-pretty fates. It’s a uniting feature of many horror movies. The ice-cool glamour of Janet Leigh’s Marion Crane meets an ice-cold end on the bathroom floor. Shelley Duval’s Wendy narrowly escapes from Jack Nicholson’s axe and impending ‘REDRUM’. Marilyn Burns’s Sally finds herself on a never-ending flight from a Texan chainsaw. Acts of evil become heightened by an actress’s beauty; the more sublime their looks, the more sadistic the punishment.

Whereas a male protagonist provides a glimmer of hope (he might physically overpower the threat or use his intellect to detect or deter the danger), the woman is often left scrambling: running through corridors; trying to slam shut or rattle open doors.

She’s a passive victim caught up in the audience’s voyeuristic fantasies. Or, more immediately, those of her director. Take Hitchcock and his ice-cool blonde.

So, is this clichéd view why so few women direct horror films?

It is historically a man’s genre when it comes to filmmakers; a fact that Warp Films recognised when they set up their Darklight initiative back in 2006. The leader of this development programme, Caroline Cooper-Charles, saw how women were being ‘excluded as audience members as well as filmmakers’ and came up with a very specific target for the scheme: to get more women making horror films in the UK.

Chatting over the phone, Cooper-Charles recalls how picking female filmmakers proved quite a tricky task. The majority of women sending in submissions had never worked in horror; there was nothing on anyone’s showreel to make her jump. Instead, Cooper-Charles focused on reels with atmospheric, creepy shorts; films that made her ‘squirm or feel uncomfortable’. The chosen directors were then assisted in developing their ideas over a course of 12 months.

As Cooper-Charles said, ‘there are so few female filmmakers working in the genre that even if two films came out of the scheme, it would have been quite a massive achievement’.

A couple of years on and there are several films in pre- and post-production: a ‘quite bloody’ exploration of motherhood entitled Little Miss Piggy; an ultra-low-budget teen horror, Freefall; and a project still in early development set in the male-dominated world of banking and business. The latter has strong thriller elements, and another director on the scheme decided to move away from horror altogether to make a thriller. Throughout our conversation,

Cooper-Charles often mentions the ‘psychological’ aspect of the women’s work; perhaps an explanation as to why many of the projects boiled over into thriller territory. Even the ‘bloody’ Little Miss Piggy is described as ‘sophisticated with a gore element’. Despite the aims of the initiative, there’s a little reluctance to associate women with out-and-out horror.

The Birds Eye View Festival will be showing a programme of horror shorts directed by women filmmakers on Saturday 12 March at the ICA (London) as part of their ‘Bloody Women’ strand.
Three of the filmmakers will be discussing their films with Electric Sheep editor Virginie Sélavy on Resonance FM 104.4 on Tuesday 8 March from 5 to 5:30pm.

After our call, Cooper-Charles writes to tell me that she is producing a film written by Lucy Moore, one of the writers who was part of Darklight, and puts me in touch with the film’s director, China Moo-Young. The following week, Moo-Young and I meet up for a coffee to discuss her film, ‘a monster movie set in Bristol’.

When I ask her why she thinks there are so few women working in horror, Moo-Young suggests that it is partly a question of role models – ‘you’ve probably got two examples of women genre directors, Catherine Hardwicke and Kathryn Bigelow… you’ve got your Jane Campions but in terms of genre, they’re your big two’ – and partly a matter of timing. Most filmmakers are making their most important films in their thirties and forties, a time when women may be engaged with childrearing and so unable to undertake the heavy commitments needed to make a feature.

But these two points are asides in a conversation that aims to avoid too much talk of gender, no matter how hard I try to steer the discussion: ‘I kind of think it’s a moot point,’ Moo-Young says, ‘ I’d like to get to a point where it isn’t an issue’.

She is not interested in taking part in schemes aimed exclusively at women directors and won’t be bestowed or lumbered with the female filmmaker tag: ‘Kathryn Bigelow’s strength is that you don’t know that she’s a woman… I wouldn’t be doing my job if you could tell which gender directed the film.’

Moo-Young also tells me that psychological horror is her favourite variety of the genre. She likes John Carpenter’s work because it is ‘restrained’; his films ‘use music and mood more than out-and-out violence’. Horror films she admires – The Shining, Rosemary’s Baby, Don’t Look Now, Jaws – are full of ‘well-drawn characters that don’t fall apart for the sake of the third act’. Ultimately, she loves horror because ‘it taps into human insecurities and fears; it’s about the strange and forbidden side of life’.

Cooper-Charles and Moo-Young are both extremely keen to emphasise the more thoughtful, intelligent aspects of horror; this careful explanation of their interest in the genre can be seen as a reaction against the sexist tendencies of horror and, in particular, slasher films. Although reluctant to talk about herself in terms of gender, Moo-Young concedes: ‘I wouldn’t ever want to generalise about fellow film directors – male or female – in terms of taste, but if a woman is a filmmaker working in horror, she’s probably not going to be making slasher films because she’ll have a female skew on violence towards women.’

This emphasis on psychological horror could also be a defence against genre snobbery; films that follow certain conventions or codes can easily be dismissed as less intelligent than other, less categorisable films. It is refreshing to talk to Moo-Young, not only because she steadfastly refuses to discuss being a woman in a discussion on gender, but also because she is very passionate about the horror genre and genre films in general. ‘I can’t really talk about it,’ she whispers, ‘but there’s a master document called the “brainstorm of kills”, with lots of different ways people could be killed off’. She talks about ‘mapping fear’ and ‘hitting genre beats’ and, in addition to her horror film, she is developing two thrillers and a romantic comedy. She sees horror as providing an opportunity to subvert the normal rules of life. She talks about the closing of Let the Right One In providing a hugely satisfying ending for the audience but also an uneasy one: on the one hand, we want Eli and Oskar to be together; on the other, we anticipate Oskar’s dark future as he takes the place of her previous protector. In horror, often the good have to commit ordinarily immoral acts in order to survive, which disorientates and challenges the audience’s normal moral framework in interesting ways.

The importance of subversion makes the idea of female directors influencing the horror genre both a natural and exciting progression. Women can question the portrayal of female victims on screen and also, viewing the genre from an outside perspective, they can shake up a rule and convention-led art form.

Those genre films that work most successfully and stand the test of time are generally those that offer something different from the tried-and-tested formula. It sounds as if Darklight has tried to champion work that fits this description. We’ll look forward to seeing the results.

Statistics (Londonfeministfilmfestival.com, 2012)

Women comprised 5% of all directors working on the top 250 US films of 2011.
Martha M. Lauzen (2011) The Celluloid Ceiling. Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film

In the USA women made up just 22% of all feature length film directors represented at 25 film festivals during the 2008–2009 season.
Martha M. Lauzen (2011) Independent Women. Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film

The percentage of women directors on broadcast television programs in the USA has declined from 16% in 2009–2010 to 11% in 2010–2011.
Martha M. Lauzen (2011) Boxed In. Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film

An analysis by the Directors Guild of America (DGA) found that minority ethnic women directed just 1% of 2600 TV episodes in the 2010–2011 television season. Minority ethnic men directed 11% of episodes (the same percentage as Caucasian women), whilst Caucasian men directed 77% of all episodes.
DGA (2011) DGA Report Assesses Director Diversity in Hiring Practices for Episodic Television

The percentage of women depicted on screen is significantly higher for films with at least one woman director (44.4%) than for those with only male directors (31.7%).
Stacy L. Smith and Marc Choueiti Gender Inequality in Cinematic Content? A look at females on screen & behind the camera in top grossing 2008 films

Julie Dash was the first black female director to have a nationally released film with Daughters of the Dust in 1991.
Lamonia Brown (2010) Hollywood’s most overlooked resource: black female directors. The Grio

Between 2007 and 2010 just 11.8% of UK films released were directed by women.
2011 BFI Statistical Yearbook

Not a single film directed by a woman has ever been in the Sight & Sound critics’ annual greatest film poll since it was started in 1952. When in 2012 a longer list containing the 50 greatest films of all time was revealed for the first time only one film by a woman was represented, at number 35 – Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce 1080 Bruxelles by Chantal Akerman.
BFI The Sight & Sound greatest film poll archive

In an extended list of the critics’ Top 250 Films of All Time only 7 were directed by women.

All are directed by white women from Europe, North America or Australia. Not a single woman director from South America, Afica or Asia made the list.
BFI Sight & Sounds 250 Greatest Films of all Time

In 2012, only five of the top 100 films at the Australian box office had a female director. Just one of these films was solely directed by a woman, the other four were co-directed by a man.
Angela Priestley (2013) Long wait before more films made from a woman’s perspective. Women’s Agenda

Of the 20 top grossing films of 2011 in Germany (accounting for more than 20 million sold tickets) only 1 was directed by a woman. A second film was co-directed by a woman.
Extracted by the London Feminist Film Festival Team from FFA-info 1/2012. German Federal Film Board

Around 20% of all the feature films made in Sweden are by women.
DORIS Network

Only 29 percent of feature films granted funding by SFI (Swedish Film Institute) in 2009 were directed by women.
Torun Börtz (2010) Swedish women behind the camera. Official website of Sweden

During the first decade of the 21st century, 22 women and 21 men graduated from the School of Film Directing in Gothenburg, Sweden, while the numbers for the University College of Film, Radio, Television, and Theatre in Stockholm were 10 men and six women. However women release their first film on average 10 years after graduation, compared to the average four years for men.
Torun Börtz (2010) Swedish women behind the camera. Official website of Sweden

Between 2000 and 2009 women directors were responsible for 23 percent of feature film debuts in Sweden.
Torun Börtz (2010) Swedish women behind the camera. Official website of Sweden

Of the 20 most watched debut films of the last decade in Sweden, only 5 (25%) had women directors. Among the critics’ top 20 Swedish debut films, seven (35%) were directed by women.
Torun Börtz (2010) Swedish women behind the camera. Official website of Sweden

In over 80 years only one woman has ever won the Academy Award for Best Director – Kathryn Bigelow (2009 – The Hurt Locker). Only three other women have ever been nominated for the award: Lina Wertmüller (1976 – Seven Beauties), Jane Campion (1993 – The Piano), and Sofia Coppola (2003 – Lost in Translation). The Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film, which goes to the director, has been won by three women: Marleen Gorris (1995 – Antonia’s Line), Caroline Link (2002 – Nowhere in Africa), and Susanne Bier (2010  – In a Better World). All these films were directed by white women from Europe, North America, or Australia.
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences

At the 2010 and 2012 Cannes Film Festivals there were no women directors shortlisted for the Palme d’Or. The highest number of women directors who have been shortlisted is four (20%), in 2011.

Charlotte Higgins (2011) Palme pioneers: women directors at Cannes. The Guardian
Cannes 2011 Festival Selection. Cannes Film Festival website
Vanessa Thorpe (2012) Cannes 2012: Why have no female film directors been nominated for the Palme d’Or at Cannes? The Guardian

Directors UK and BBC to pilot training for women directors (Directors.uk.com, 2014)

Directors UK and the BBC are piloting two new workshops aimed at women directors returning to work after a career break or repositioning their directing career. The training initiatives are being introduced as a result of Directors UK’s strategy to work with broadcasters and production houses to explore ways of increasing the numbers of women working as directors across film and television.

The workshops will offer advice and guidance to women directors returning to work or who are seeking a renewed impetus, with tips and techniques on how to re-launch, maintain and develop a successful freelance directing career following a break.  At the end of each there will be a networking event giving the directors an opportunity to meet with key BBC Commissioners and Executives.

The pilot for this initiative is being delivered as part of the ongoing working partnership between Directors UK and the BBC and reflects the Broadcaster’s commitment to develop a sustainable action plan aimed at improving opportunities for women directors.  The workshops will be run by Helen Matthews from Media Parents and Shiona Llewellyn – a well-known career development specialist – and will be held during March and April in London and Salford.

Directors UK Chief Executive Andrew Chowns: “We are pleased that the BBC is working with us to deliver practical training and networking opportunities for women directors. Empowering women returning to work is a positive step towards our goal of improving the employment prospects of women directors across film and television.”

Kate Harwood, BBC Head of Drama, England commented: “Ben Stephenson and I are keen to drive this initiative encouraging and supporting women directors either returning to work or developing their careers across the industry. We believe this is the first step towards growing a more representative talent pool and we look forward to making a difference.”

Members looking to book their place please follow the links to the London and Salford workshops.

– See more at: http://www.directors.uk.com/about-us/news/directors-uk-and-bbc-pilot-training-women-directors#sthash.YzIXZYkK.dpuf

BFI Statistical Yearbook Shows Decline in UK Female Writers and Directors (Wftv.org.uk, 2013)

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

This morning, the BFI announced the key findings of it’s Statistical Yearbook, which annually presents the most comprehensive picture of film in the UK as well as the performance of British films abroad.

Since 2007, the tracking of statistics for the number of female writers and directors has been included as part of the Employment in the Film Industry section of the report (formerly compiled by the UK Film Council).

This year’s report, which draws on data from 2012, showed that UK women film writers declined from 18.9% of the total writers in 2011 to 13.4% (25 writers) in 2012, the second-lowest number in five years.

Even more worryingly, women accounted for just 7.8% of directors on UK films in 2012, a decrease of more than 7% year-on-year (15% in 2011). This translates into 165 male directors and 14 female directors, and puts women directors in film almost on a par with the 8% of female directors currently working in TV drama as revealed by Directors UK earier this year.

Read the full Statistical Yearbook online or download it as a PDF here.

22.2 The gender of writers and directors of UK films
Since 2007, we have been tracking the under-representation of women among screenwriters and directors of UK films.
In 2013, we published a report Succès de plume? Female Screenwriters and Directors
of UK Films, 2010-2012 which showed that although the numbers of female writers and directors of UK films released are consistently low, recently higher proportions of women have been associated with successful films (see link at end of chapter).
Of the independent UK films released between 2010 and 2012, just 16% of the writers and 11% of the directors were women. However, for the top 20 UK independent films over the same period, women represented 37% of the writers and 18% of the directors. And for profitable UK independent films, 30% of the writers were women.
Successful female writers and directors of independent UK films over this period include: Jane Goldman (The Woman in Black and Kick-Ass), Debbie Isitt (Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger), Phyllida Lloyd and Abi Morgan (The Iron Lady), Dania Pasquini and Jane English (StreetDance and StreetDance 2), and Lucinda Whiteley (Horrid Henry: The Movie).
In addition to independent UK films, a number of female writers and directors had success over the same period working on UK-USA studio titles. Examples include: Jane Goldman (X-Men: First Class), Lone Scherfig (One Day), Sarah Smith (Arthur Christmas), Susanna White and Emma Thompson (Nanny McPhee and the Big Bang).
In 2013, of the 155 identified writers of UK films released during the year, 22 (14%) were women
The proportion of female directors in 2013 was higher than in 2012,
but it still remained low, at 14%. Some of the female directors associated with UK films released in 2013 are: Clio Barnard (The SelfishGiant), Emma Davie and Morag McKinnon (I Am Breathing), Sophie Fiennes (The Pervert’s Guide to Ideology),Tina Gharavi (I Am Nasrine
) and Jacqui Morris (McCullin). Clio Barnard and Tina Gharavi both wrote the screenplays of their films as well as directing them.
(BFI, 2014)
As well as this, I have found the BFI report from 2010-2012 on the amount of women filmmakers in the industry, which shows the low figures explained in the previous source, at this link:

British film is booming but not for female directors (Vincent, 2013)

British Film continues to break records at the global box office, but just one of the UK’s highest grossing films since 2001 was directed by a woman.

Phyllida Lloyd, here on the set of Mamma Mia!, is the only female director to direct a top UK film.

Phyllida Lloyd, here on the set of Mamma Mia!, is the only female director to direct a top UK film. Photo: Peter Mountain

Statistics released from the British Film Institute show that UK film is continuing to entertain around the world, taking $5.3 billion (£3.5 billion) at the global box office.

However, female filmmakers are seeing a mere fraction of this.

Of the British films that were included in the top 200 grossing films worldwide between 2001 and 2012, only one was directed by a woman: the 2008 musical Mamma Mia, which was directed by Phyllida Lloyd. Female-directed films took 4.5% of the $1.3 billion (£8.6 billion) earned by the top British films.

The BFI also charted the British stars who had made more than four appearances in the Top 200 films, either as lead or supporting roles. Of these 12, eight were men and three were women: Helena Bonham Carter, Julie Walters and Emma Watson.

Together, Bonham Carter, Walters and Watson made 24 appearances in the top 200 films, compared with the 55 made by the male stars. Of the total box office takings from the top films, those featuring Bonham Carter, Walters and Watson had a 30 per cent share.

Films inspired or based on novels or original screenplays by British writers took $17.7 billion (£11.5 billion) at the global box office since 2001. Earnings from films based on titles written by men are only marginally higher than those written by women: $9.4 billion to $8.3 billion, respectively. However, there were only two female UK authors on that list: JK Rowling and Catherine Johnson, who wrote the musical book and screenplay for Mamma Mia!

In contrast, books and screenplays by seven male authors had inspired successful films: Ian Fleming, HG Wells, CS Lewis, Christopher Nolan, JRR Tolkein and Lewis Carroll.

Beryl Richards, a director and chair of the Directors UK Women’s Working Group, said the lack of women involved in the British film industry was “appalling, but just not generally noticed”. She explained that there was a correlation between the unrepresentation of women in the top 200 films and the fact they are in the action, thriller and fantasy genres. “There’s significant gender stereotyping and misconceptions about who’s allowed to direct in which genre. Women just don’t get access to those areas of film.”

At the Empire Awards in March Dame Helen Mirren criticised director Sam Mendes, who directed the UK’s highest grossing film of all time, Skyfall, for not acknowledging women in the film industry.

Why are there so few female film-makers? (Cochrane, 2010)

No woman has ever won an Oscar for directing. Could this be the year that all changes?
Beeban Kidron filming Bridget Jones

Cracking the boys’ club … Beeban Kidron filming Bridget Jones: Edge of Reason Photograph: Ronald Grant Archive

For Vanity Fair’s annual ­Hollywood issue a few years back, photographer Annie Leibovitz created a classic image of a film director at work. Posing beneath a stormy sky, George Clooney stood with his shirt ripped open, trousers tucked rakishly into his boots, arms outstretched – a young Orson Welles meets Michelangelo’s vision of God. His crew were a crowd of female models in flesh-coloured lingerie; not the obvious costume for a camera operator, but there you are. This was the auteur as masculine genius, a warrior amid a sea of passive women.

This has long been the archetype of the film director, but over the last few months a host of women have been making waves: Sam Taylor-Wood with Nowhere Boy, Lone Scherfig with An Education, Andrea Arnold with Fish Tank. Then there are Kathryn Bigelow and Jane Campion, both trailing Oscar buzz for The Hurt Locker and Bright Star respectively.

So, is this a new era for female film-makers? Unfortunately, the numbers suggest otherwise.

In a study published last year, Professor Martha Lauzen of San Diego State University found that only 9% of Hollywood directors in 2008 were women – the same figure she had recorded in 1998. If Bigelow is nominated for the best directing Oscar in March, it will be only the fourth time a woman has been nominated, out of more than 400 director nominations altogether (the other three were Lina Wertmüller in 1976, Jane Campion in 1993, and Sofia Coppola in 2003). No woman has ever won.

No wonder, then, that last year Campion entreated ­aspiring female directors to “put on their coats of armour and get going”.

Once, the dearth of women directors could be traced to the small numbers entering film school. These days, that’s not the case.

Lauzen says women are now well represented in US film schools, while Neil Peplow, of the UK training organisation Skillset, says women make up around 34% of directing ­students in Britain. That translates into a large number of female ­graduates making short films, but few moving on to features.

Over the years, this failure to progress has often been blamed on a chauvinist culture; and certainly, talking to ­established directors, it’s easy to ­uncover tales of overt sexism – from the mildly disconcerting to the downright illegal. The British film director Antonia Bird (Priest, Mad Love) says dryly that on her first directing job, “I was the only woman there, and all the guys just ­assumed I was the producer’s PA. That was good.” Director Beeban Kidron (Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason) once sacked a male assistant director who called her “the little lady”. At the extreme end, US film director Penelope Spheeris, who made the $100m-grossing Wayne’s World, remembers meeting an executive at the Beverly Hills Hotel when she was at the start of her career. “And the guy was pretty drunk, and he ripped some of my clothes trying to take them off me, and when I got up and started screaming he said, ‘Did you want to make this music video or not?'” She pauses. “You say sexist, I say felony.”

When it comes to sexism, Martha Coolidge – director of Rambling Rose and Real Genius, as well as the first woman president of the Directors Guild of America – has heard it all. There was the story of the female president of a major studio who said “no woman over 40 could possibly have the stamina to ­direct a ­feature film. I’ve heard ­people say that the kind of films they want to make are too big, too tough for a female director. The worst was when my agent sent another woman director in for an interview, and afterwards the guy called up and said, ‘Never send anyone again who I wouldn’t want to fuck.'”

There are signs that this culture is changing. A 2009 report – carried out by the UK networking organisation Women in Film and Television (WFTV) and Skillset – found that, while “a number of older participants reported direct experience of overt sexism, none of the younger participants [did]”. But Coolidge insists that the film industry – and Hollywood specifically – remains a minefield,

because “there is such a ­sexual component for the men who go into it. If all they wanted to do is to make money, they could just go to Wall Street. If you’re a male executive, a producer – and I’m not talking about everybody, but the vast majority – you’re there partly because you’re ­surrounded by gorgeous girls. And that means that the older a woman is, the less they want them around. A woman would disrupt the flow of their lives.” Coolidge and others point out that this is as true for black, working-class, and gay film-makers – in fact, ­anyone outside a small ­circle of privilege.

More subtle reasons have been mooted for the dearth of women at the top. One suggestion I heard is that women are brought up to ­negotiate in very ­different ways from men, which is problematic in a male-dominated environment. Coolidge doesn’t agree with this – “there are plenty of women who are good ­negotiators” – but Kate Kinninmont of WFTV says she has noticed that, while “women are brilliant at pitching ­somebody else, they’re not often good at pitching themselves”. Lauzen says reporters have told her that “when they talk to the guys, they can’t shut ’em up. But when they talk to the women, it’s like pulling teeth . . . Women have to promote themselves, but when they do, it’s seen as being unfeminine.”

There is also the simple fact that the fewer women there are at the top, the fewer role models and mentors there are; those women who do forge ahead often talk of having to actively ignore the figures.

Kidron says that when she was making her first film, she had “a phone call from a journalist who said, ‘Do you know you’re only the third woman ever to make a feature film in Britain?’ And I said, ‘Oh, please don’t tell me,’ and put the phone down, ­because I didn’t want the pressure.”

A lack of female film-makers also seems to have made it difficult for ­studios to imagine women in charge. Film is big business, filled with financial risk, and so “the whole industry is based on demonstrable success,” says Peplow. “Unless something has worked in the past, it’s very rare that people will take a risk. There’s this perception that, well, traditionally it’s a man’s role, so we won’t buck that.”

It’s true that men have directed the great majority of high-grossing films over the last decade. The website ­indiewire.com recently reported that, of the 241 films that had grossed $100m or more in the US over the last 10 years, only seven were directed by women (Shrek, Shark Tale, Twilight, What Women Want, The Proposal, Mamma Mia!, and Something’s Gotta Give).

But a closer look at the figures reveals that women film-makers aren’t a bigger financial risk. In 2008, Lauzen conducted a study called Women@the Box Office, which found that the key to big grosses wasn’t the gender of the film-maker, but the budget. Big budgets equalled big grosses. “When women and men have similar budgets,” she wrote, “the ­resulting box office grosses are also similar.”

The problem is that the biggest budgets tend to be given to films that appeal to teenage boys – still considered the most frequent, most enthusiastic moviegoers (this may be because so many films are aimed at them, but that’s another argument). There’s no reason why women can’t make films for this audience – as Spheeris did with Wayne’s World. But female directors say that it is difficult to get assigned to the kind of comedy, horror or action movie that would establish their box office chops.

Despite the enormous success of films such as Mamma Mia! and ­Twilight, executives often seem ­perplexed by films with female themes. “I’ve been there when a film with a female protagonist has been screened,” says Lauzen, “and the guys at the top go, ‘Well, I don’t get it.’ When the majority of people in power are male, who are they going to relate to most on screen, and who do they think other people are going to relate to? Males. That’s no big conspiracy. I don’t even think it’s conscious, honestly.” Bird agrees. “One of the big problems is that, 90% of the time, the people who you pitch your idea to are male, and even though they might be very ­sympathetic, they do look at the world from a different perspective.”

I ask Lauzen whether she thinks ­female film careers are interrupted by motherhood, and she says no, as do Kinninmont and Coolidge (the latter has extensive experience of juggling the two). They point out that directors tend to be highly driven; there are many cases of heavily pregnant women and young mothers making films. “A lot of them will say, ‘Look, I wouldn’t let that get in my way,'” says Lauzen.

Kidron, however, says that motherhood has affected her ­career “more than gender . . . At a certain point I had to stop making films in America, and make them here, which made a huge difference. Obviously men also give up an ­enormous amount for their families, but there are many male directors who have partners who take primary care of the family, or who are free to travel with them. That is rarely true the other way around. I absolutely don’t want to suggest that women are unreliable ­because we’re mothers – on the ­contrary. But the question of who brings up the kids has a material ­effect on all women’s careers.”

Bird agrees. “Film directing is more than a full-time job. When you’re ­making a film, it takes up every day of your life, 16 to 18 hours a day, for a year. Trying to have children and being a film director is virtually impossible ­unless you’re rich.” Bird doesn’t have children: “If I look deep down inside myself,” she says, “I’m quite sure that I never did it because I never really had time.”

The problems facing female ­directors are structural and systemic, a tangled mix of sexism, cultural ­differences between men and women, and maternity issues; in this, they ­mirror the problems affecting many women in male-dominated workplaces. But the film industry magnifies all this. As Spheeris says: “When the stakes are high, when fame and ­extreme amounts of money and power are involved, it’s a jungle out there. It’s brutal. How hard do you want to fight?”

Thankfully, many women are ­prepared to fight. British director Lindy Heymann, for instance, whose second feature, Kicks, is released this year, says that one of the great lessons from shooting that film was the realisation that she “didn’t have to be liked, that that’s the last thing you should be thinking about”. She’s just one of the film-makers heeding Campion’s ­rally cry, getting her armour on; given the high visibility of female film-­makers now – Drew Barrymore makes her directorial debut this year, and there are films in the pipeline from Claire Denis, Gurinder Chadha, Nicole Holofcener, Julie Taymor and Sofia Coppola – perhaps others will be ­inspired, too. If Bigelow raises that gold statuette in March, many more women might breach the boys’ club.

10 great British films directed by women (British Film Institute, 2014)

It was decades before more than a handful of women had the opportunity to direct feature films in the UK. With Joanna Hogg’s third film, Exhibition, confirming her as among our best new filmmakers, we look back at some of the greatest British films by female directors.

Exhibition (2013)

Exhibition (2013)

Exhibition, the third feature by Joanna Hogg (Unrelated, 2008; Archipelago, 2011), fits flush alongside Chantal Akerman’s Toute une nuit (1982), recently screened by Hogg as part of her film club A Nos Amours’ rare retrospective of Akerman’s films at London’s ICA. Both films are set in urban environments (Exhibition’s location is west London). Both feature often unexplained psychosexual encounters between couples (The Slits guitarist Viv Albertine and YBA conceptual artist Liam Gillick play Hogg’s married couple D and H). Both use homes, windows and doorways to structure choreographed interactions that physically explore urban anxiety and tender love. Confirming Hogg as one of the foremost directors working in Britain today, Exhibition unfolds like a Pina Bausch dance piece.

Information and materials about the history of female directors in the UK is as ambiguous and evasive as the meanings offered by Exhibition, but some probing proves equally rewarding. Looking back to the 1920s, Dinah Shurey was probably Britain’s only female feature film director of the decade, with her lost 1929 film The Last Post currently in the top 10 of our Most Wanted list.

Jump forward to the 1930s and novelist Elinor Glyn is credited in directing two films, Knowing Men and The Price of Things (both 1930). Although a number of female directors flourished making non-fiction films in the 30s and 40s (Mary Field, Marion Grierson, Kay Mander, Ruby Grierson), moving into fiction feature films was even more difficult. Only in the 1950s did the trickle start to become a stream, with films by Wendy Toye, Muriel Box and Lorenza Mazzetti.

Alarmingly, the 1960s, that decade of social upheaval and early women’s liberation, brought few opportunities for British women behind the camera (Joan Littlewood with the 1962 Sparrows Can’t Sing is a rare exception).

The radical experimentalist Jane Arden held the reins in the 1970s (with Laura Mulvey co-directing Riddles of the Sphinx with Peter Woollen in 1976), while in the 1980s bravely experimental (but now hard to see) work was produced by filmmakers such as Sarah Turner, Pratibha Parmar, Margaret Tait and Ngozi Onwurah that would lay the groundwork for later features.

Onwurah went on to be the first black British female director of a feature film with Welcome II the Terrordome in 1995 (also sadly unavailable). Then, in the 1980s and 90s, the floodgates finally began to open, with funding from the BFI and Film Four increasing the visibility of a new generation of female auteurs, including Sally Potter, Penny Woolcock, Kim Longinotto and Lynne Ramsay.

Focusing on titles that are readily available in the UK, here are some of Britain’s finest films directed by women.

Selina Robertson and Jemma Desai

Blue Scar (1949)

Director Jill Craigie

Jill Craigie made her name with a string of excellent documentaries. She made only one fiction feature, the coalmining drama Blue Scar, set in south-west Wales. Olwen (Gwyneth Vaughan) leaves her sweetheart to pursue a singing career in London, while Tom (Emrys Jones) sticks to his roots and eventually becomes manager of the village colliery. But will he try and win Olwen back?

A socialist, Craigie laces her film with sharp political comment. The coalmining industry had been nationalised two years previously, yet she is careful to show the flaws in the new system, while her expert location shooting in Abergwynfi adds great authenticity, and a scene in which an accident occurs down the pit is particularly chilling. Craigie followed Blue Scar with her very best film, the documentary To Be a Woman (1951), arguing for equal pay.

Alex Davidson

Simon and Laura (1955)

Director Muriel Box

Long before the comedy series W1A, the BBC was mercilessly satirised on the big screen in Muriel Box’s Technicolor extravaganza Simon and Laura. From the corporation’s addiction to acronyms to the slavish pursuit of the inane, the film dissects the world of 1950s television. Adapted from a popular stage play, it also manages to mock the bane of 21st century home-viewing – the reality TV show. Simon and Laura Foster are a theatrical couple whose relationship and careers are on the rocks. When they’re offered a TV series depicting their idyllic home life they can’t refuse the work, but the programme lays bare the fault lines in their marriage.

The film is a riot of repartee between the Fosters (Peter Finch and Kay Kendall), and Box keeps the action moving at a slick pace. Simon and Laura combines a script worthy of the best 1930s screwball comedies with the pleasures of widescreen colour, ably assisted in this by art director Carmen Dillon and costume designer Julie Harris.

Josephine Botting

Ruddigore (1967)

Director Joy Batchelor

Based on the comic opera by Gilbert & Sullivan, Ruddigore was originally commissioned for American television but released theatrically in the UK, making it only the second animated feature to be made in Britain. The first was 1954’s Animal Farm, which was co-directed by the same remarkable lady, Joy Batchelor.

To emphasise how exceptional this is, there would not be another British animated feature directed by a woman until Sarah Smith’s Arthur Christmas in 2011.

Personally, I consider it an even bigger achievement of Joy’s that Ruddigore has enough to engage and often delight me despite the unpleasant shudder that goes down my spine at the first notes of a Gilbert & Sullivan work.

The BFI National Archive holds the notepads in which Batchelor stripped the libretto down to around half its original length, while sketching out a storyboard shot-by-shot and designing the characters. The women in the film are particularly strong, especially the bridesmaid chorus who move and dance as one in a curtain of pink chiffon with delightful comic touches.

Jez Stewart

The Other Side of the Underneath (1972)

Director Jane Arden

One of the most uncompromisingly radical feminist films ever made in Britain (and, almost unbelievably, the only 1970s British feature film solo-directed by a woman), Jane Arden’s The Other Side of the Underneath is a fractured study of highly disturbed young women undergoing therapy in a run-down Victorian-era asylum in the deceptively idyllic Welsh countryside. It remains that rarest of beasts: a film that takes female mental illness and its various manifestations and ramifications wholly seriously.

Very loosely adapted from Arden’s 1971 multimedia stage piece A New Communion for Freaks, Prophets and Witches, the film blends conventional dramatic performance (Arden herself plays a psychiatrist), nightmarishly symbolic hallucinations, actual group therapy sessions and a grotesque pagan ‘festival’ in which the use of real ‘outcasts’ (people genuinely ostracised by conventional society, often for mental-health reasons) arguably tips the film over into outright exploitation, only defensible as part of Arden’s desire to shake her audience out of any lingering complacency at every possible opportunity.

Michael Brooke

Orlando (1992)

Director Sally Potter

Sally Potter’s witty and ravishing Orlando bursts onto the screen full of sly jokes, visual delights and startling insights. This intrepid adaptation of Virginia Woolf’s ‘unfilmable’ novel of the same title stars Tilda Swinton in dazzling form as the title character, travelling through 400 years of English history and changing sex in the process. Quentin Crisp also glitters as a stunning Queen Elizabeth I.

Swinton’s glances and words to the camera are an inventive interpretation of Virginia Woolf’s direct addresses to her readers. Orlando typifies Potter’s multifarious approach to filmmaking ever since her teenage experimental work and her ongoing involvement in other branches of the arts – including choreography and music.

Ros Cranston

Bhaji on the Beach (1993)

Director Gurinder Chadha

It’s been 20 years since Gurinder Chadha’s debut feature arrived on screens, raising eyebrows with its brash comedic portrait of British Asian women dealing with life’s disappointments while enjoying a day at the seaside. The script by Chadha and Meera Syal tackles an impressive array of issues – domestic abuse, interracial tensions and unplanned pregnancy all feature and are deftly managed by the ensemble cast. While several of the women are seeking escape on their day out, others are just hoping to meet boys and it all reaches a surprising climax as the group attends a male strip show.

The culture clash between older and younger generations, a hallmark of Chadha’s work, provides much of the comedy as well as some tender moments. Bhaji on the Beach remains lively and poignant with some charming flourishes, including one character’s Bollywood-inspired daydreams and lovingly shot scenes of Blackpool’s Golden Mile. Chadha went on to direct the hugely popular Bend It like Beckham (2002).

Lisa Kerrigan

Under the Skin (1997)

Director Carine Adler

No relation to Jonathan Glazer’s recent film, Brazilian-born writer/director Carine Adler’s Under the Skin is a phenomenally intense drama that charts the psychological breakdown of 19-year-old Iris (played by Samantha Morton in her first starring role), who, prompted by the untimely death of her mother, tries to find meaning for herself through relentless and increasingly masochistic casual sex with strangers.

Shot by Ken Loach’s regular cinematographer, Barry Ackroyd, the film’s hand-held angles and obscured shots succinctly mirror Iris’s inner chaos. Significantly, Rita Tushingham plays Iris’s mother, creating a link between Under the Skin and A Taste of Honey, an earlier British feminist film from 1961 that explored a mother-daughter relationship and a young woman’s emancipation. The film won the Michael Powell Award at the Edinburgh Film Festival in 1997 and was a landmark moment for British and feminist cinema in its fresh and uncompromising exploration of female sexuality, the body and familial relationships from a female perspective. Sadly, Adler stepped away from filmmaking in 2002.

Selina Robertson

The Arbor (2010)

Director Clio Barnard

I don’t really believe in documentary’s ability to tell the truth and I don’t really believe in any idea of authenticity in terms of a style of filmmaking, no matter what the subject matter is. – Clio Barnard

Clio Barnard’s experimental debut feature, The Arbor, is as much a critique of the documentary form as it is a riveting portrait of a housing estate and its inhabitants, in particular the working-class playwright Andrea Dunbar, best known for writing Rita, Sue and Bob Too (1987).

The film’s title derives from the street in Bradford’s Buttershaw estate, Brafferton Arbor, where Dunbar was brought up and drew inspiration for her gritty realist plays. Eschewing convention, Barnard, who shares her protagonist’s Yorkshire roots, revisited a method of storytelling that she had experimented with in one of her earlier shorts, Random Acts of Intimacy (2002), in which actors lip-synch to audio recordings of real people talking about having sex with strangers. Deployed in The Arbor, the technique gives nuance to the realist elements and results in a subtly unsettling film that hailed the arrival of a fresh voice in British cinema. Her second film is the highly acclaimed social-realist fable The Selfish Giant (2013).

Catherine McGahan

Dreams of a Life (2011)

Director Carol Morley

In January 2006, the body of Joyce Carol Vincent was discovered in a North London bedsit. Her death, from unknown causes, remained undetected for over two years. In Dreams of a Life, filmmaker Carol Morley attempts to piece together the fragments of Vincent’s life in order to understand how this popular woman’s death could remain undiscovered for so long. A number of Vincent’s friends and former colleagues contribute to the film, sharing their memories and anecdotes about her; a moving eulogy to someone who clearly touched many lives.

Morley and her producer Cairo Cannon have a proud filmography of work that finds universal resonance in deeply personal stories. Here their investigations lead to a film that not only gives testament to Vincent’s life but also evokes the unique bond between friends and the particular grief felt when they are gone.

Dylan Cave

Wuthering Heights (2011)

Director Andrea Arnold

Andrea Arnold’s first two features, Red Road (2006) and Fish Tank (2009), feature complex and flawed female leads in urban settings, establishing her as a writer/director firmly rooted in the social-realist British tradition. For her third feature, she turned her hand to another thoroughly British genre – the literary adaptation – with startling results. Notably, the casting of the unknown James Howson as her adult Heathcliff threatened to overshadow the film’s reception, with stories emerging that his voice had been dubbed by another actor’s voice in the edit.

Whatever the imperfection of the film’s second half, Wuthering Heights is a visionary piece of filmmaking, and a thoroughly modern adaptation. Redrawing Heathcliff from a vaguely exotic mysterious stranger to a most definitely black and fiercely resented outsider, Arnold strips back the trappings and distance of traditional costume drama. It is her work with director of photography Robbie Ryan that’s the real revelation though: together they create a natural landscape that brutally evokes the passionate cruelty at the gothic heart of the source material.

Women and Film (Hedditch, 2014)

Women on both sides of the Camera

To look separately at the role of women in the fields of film, video and television in Britain is to recognise that the experiences of women in these areas are somehow different to those of men. The work by women in moving image production both reflects and informs the position of women within British society since the 1920s.

In the silent period, Mary Field and sisters Marion and Ruby Grierson took advantage of the camaraderie and pioneering spirit of the time by joining the British documentary movement, where they made opportunities for themselves and other women to enter the system of film production.

Their influence and impact on the movement was significant: Field is noted for her work on the Secrets of Nature series (1922-33) and for her inauguration, in 1944, of the children’s entertainment division of British Instructional Films.

During the Second World War, women were among many filmmakers employed to make films for the Ministry of Information. Muriel Box, once a continuity girl, began directing short documentaries. In the postwar period, there were great changes for women in society; women demanded more autonomy and the opportunity to fulfil their potential.

In contrast, the film industry, unions and work conditions retained a rigid structure, and many women directors were rejected or moved to less influential roles.

By the 1950s, women already played a key role as audience members and consumers of film culture. Understanding female audiences became an important factor in the success or failure of a film. The melodrama genre is designed to appeal to a specifically female audience because of its emotional and sentimental content, and its depiction of femininity.

Although great consumers of the film, few women directed during this period, although one notable exception is Wendy Toye.

The British new wave saw a new depiction of women and sexuality, in films like Poor Cow (d. Ken Loach, 1967) and A Taste of Honey (d. Tony Richardson, 1961), which departed from the romantic vision of melodrama. Female characters were seen to break moral codes and defy expectations of how they should behave. But in the hands of male directors, the representation of women in these films tells us more about the position of men and their feelings about women than about the way women feel about themselves.

It was not until the early 1970s that feminism and women’s consciousness began to influence the production, exhibition and distribution of film and television, as well as education and the emerging film theory. In 1972, the Edinburgh Film Festival included a women’s section for the first time. Women began to engage in debates about their position in society and the ways women were represented in film, television and advertising. Using film and television as a communication tool to meet and educate women, groups like the London Women’s Film Group began working within communities in regional locations.

The arrival in 1982 of Channel 4, with its remit to cater for ‘minority audiences’, brought some hope to women film and video directors. Although there was no specific remit to support women’s work, a number of documentary series by women were commissioned, including the weekly current affairs programmes 20/20 Vision and Broadside, and the magazine show Watch the Woman. The ACTT Workshop Declaration of 1984 offered further opportunities for groups of women filmmakers to break through the barriers that had previously prevented them entering the industry, and became the basis for Channel 4 commisions.

The 1980s brought increased awareness of discrimination against women technicians and pressure on institutions such as the British Film Institute to support women’s work. Through the BFI’s education department and production fund there was some temporary support for British feminist films and funding for feminist distributors.

During the 1990s, shifts in politics and a transformation of production and exhibition technologies allowed greater accessibility to the media, but the new market economy and a backlash against feminism contributed to a move away from overtly feminist practice.

Today, despite the successes of Sally Potter, Antonia Bird and Lynne Ramsay, there are still relatively few women directing, particularly in feature films; they are more commonly found in production roles. In the areas of documentary and experimental film, however, women have directed a substantial body of work. This suggests that away from the constraints of the commercial film industry, greater opportunities exist to explore the representation of women’s lives and their subjective experience.

Where the girls are: female filmmakers at the 10th London Short Film Festival (Coatman, 2014)

Boys got to make nearly all the big films in 2012 – yet further down the film chain women directors are flourishing. Is this ghettoisation, or headway?

Filming Muriel D’Ansembourg's Good Night

Filming Muriel D’Ansembourg’s Good Night
Credit: Luke Varley

“Everything seems to be about being successful,” laments Philip Ilson, the co-founder and director of the London Short Film Festival. “A lot of filmmakers, though, are getting out there and making stuff because they’re passionate about it; they don’t know if it’s going to be successful or not. And it’s the same with us…”

We’re talking outside Screen 2 at the ICA, after back-to-back programmes of short films entitled ‘Femmes Fantastique’ and ‘Teenage Girls Go Crazy!’ Images as vivid and varied as a grieving mother smoking her way through her son’s weed stash, a swirling murder of crows in a cloudless sky and a plump white tampon soaked in vodka are freshly imprinted in my head. LSFF10 is in full swing.

Still going strong after a decade, while a number of similar operations have recently either wobbled or called it quits, the LSFF has, actually, been rather successful. But Ilson is determined to ensure it retains a DIY ethos nonetheless. This “slightly sort of punk aesthetic” is signalled by the tagline to this year’s proceedings, ‘Dare to Fail’, which is taken from a John Cassavetes quote (discovered via its adoption by 1980s hardcore band Minor Threat): “As an artist, I feel that we must try many things, but above all we must dare to fail.”

The day after I spoke to Ilson, the nominations for the BAFTAs were announced – and then promptly elbowed out of the limelight by the nominations for the Oscars. The awards, arguably, epitomise the celebration of ‘success’ to which the LSFF aims to provide an antidote. While their field of vision seems bounded to the mainstream, the festival is on the lookout for the leftfield, scheduling animations, installations, live music and midnight ‘happenings’ into its programme. The ‘failure’ of the films Sightseers and Berberian Sound Studio to garner much attention in the shortlists only compounded this impression – particularly as Alice Lowe (co-writer/star of the former film) and Peter Strickland (writer-director of the latter) both gave talks about their formative forays in short films at the LSFF.

Romola Garai's Scrubber

Romola Garai’s Scrubber

But this wasn’t the only contrast.

With the exception of Kathryn Bigelow, who has been nominated for BAFTA for Zero Dark Thirty, both lists of best-director nominations are made up exclusively of men. This would seem to suggest there are very few women out there directing films. Yet the demographics of the LSFF programme showed this was not at all the case; women directed almost 40 per cent of the new shorts in the festival.

That percentage included the actress Romola Garai, whose behind-the-camera debut Scrubber (above) won the Underwire Award, and Ivana Bobic [homepage], who both directed the LSFF10 trailer and launched her collaborative installation Signals (see the first video section embedded below). It included Alice Lowe and Jacqueline Wright ‘in conversation’ about their collaborative work, as well as Jemma Desai, presenting her project I am Dora, which explores women’s identification with each other through film, and Ruth Paxton [homepage], whose films were shown as an installation at the ICA throughout the week.

The BAFTAs and the Oscars do reflect one truth, however: in the world of major Hollywood feature films, women account for just five per cent of directors. (That rises to 22 per cent of Sundance feature films, and nearly half of Sundance documentaries.)

The question this throws up – ‘Why Can’t Women Make Feature Films?’ – was asked in a panel discussion chaired by Kate Taylor (Ilson’s LSFF co-founder) at the Underwire Film Festival (a festival for shorts by women) last November, prompted by the comparatively large number of female filmmakers who submitted shorts to the LSFF a year ago. When I spoke to female filmmakers at this year’s festival, it was clear many of them are finding themselves forced to ask it too.

Fran Broadhurst is one half of the writing and directing duo Mathy & Fran [homepage], who made The Lights and then the Noise (above), a fiercely energetic, black and white film set at a No Age gig. She explained that she had experienced a lot of encouragement when making shorts: “There’s a lot of support currently available for female directors at the shorts, or ‘entry’, level, which is great – I work in a male/female directing partnership, so have been able to see it from both sides – and there are far more opportunities that present themselves to me than to my male co-director.”

The kind of help she described was in evidence in the industry element of the LSFF, as Cassandra Neal, the producer of this year’s festival, outlined: “We have an event with Underwire festival – a dinner specifically for women filmmakers. We’ve also got WFTV hosting a mentoring event. So there is slightly more emphasis on this kind of support than there has been in previous years.”

On the other hand, “the world of features seems a different beast altogether,” Broadhurst noted. “There’s a notable gap between the amount of women making shorts and those established in features, and at the top of the industry I think there’s still a resistance towards new female talent. There’s a dominance of male directors and producers, and has been for some time.”

A similar picture was painted by Muriel D’Ansembourg [homepage]. Her film Good Night [homepage; pictured at top] is about girls growing up in a culture that seems to value ‘sexiness’ above all else. It was screened alongside Mathy & Fran’s, and has just been nominated for the Best Short Film BAFTA. D’Ansembourg is currently planning on making a feature film with a similar subject, and is aware that she’ll be confronting a much more male-dominated world: “The [female] talent that I’ve seen come out of film school makes me really surprised how few female filmmakers there are out there eventually – making feature films. And I’d like to know why – because I definitely think there’s something going on.”

The suggestions as to what this something could be ranged from a lack of confidence in women – both on their own account and on the part of investors – to a business culture where taking time out to have a family spells disaster, to the possibility that stories told by women aren’t considered as interesting, or commercial, by the film industry. Each possibility has a bigger story behind it, and deserves much more space than I can give it here.

Little wonder then that some female filmmakers choose to stay well clear from the industry altogether. Rachel Garfield [homepage], whose experimental but very personal The Straggle featured in the festival’s fascinating ‘Artist’s Documentary Elegies for Ideologies’ programme, makes her films within the art world instead. Chiming with Ilson’s ‘slightly sort of punk’ ambitions, she pondered: “There seems a big rush for people to make feature films. For some, it’s fantastic, but I also ask, Why? Is it that you think that’s the real deal, and you really wanted to make feature films before but couldn’t? I love feature films but they don’t interest me as a form at all, so I don’t even try to make them. And I don’t try to get funding either.”

Of course there are – and always have been – women who have tried, and succeeded, in making feature films. Andrea Arnold was championed in previous years by the LSFF, and went on to make the features Red Road, Fish Tank and Wuthering Heights, each of which met with enormous critical acclaim.

Likewise Carol Morley began by making shorts – including My Neighbour Stalin, shown as part of a Pussy Riot fundraiser in the festival – and released her first feature, Dreams of a Life, in 2011. She told me, “I have no idea how I got here – other than going through a process of just knowing there were stories I wanted to tell, then grappling with how to tell them. It’s difficult but I consider it really ideologically and politically important to make films. When you see something made by somebody with a different perspective, it has a power.”

Alice Lowe in a Jackal Films production

Alice Lowe in a Jackal Films production

The importance of seeing different perspectives on screen – and of having different female role models to look up to – was echoed by many of the filmmakers I spoke to, including Alice Lowe, who’s now working on a new feature which she will this time direct. “You need someone who’s a bit like you, but further along in their career. And it is very hard to find those kind of mentors, because there aren’t so many female directors out there.”

She was optimistic, however, that this is something that will change. “Enjoy being a woman” was her advice for other female filmmakers. “Enjoy the fact that you’re still edgy, in terms of the [perceptions of the] film industry. It’s new, exciting and kind of taboo. I think that soon, finally, people in the industry will start to think ‘Ah!’ and [wake up to] that.”

So perhaps for the new generation of female filmmakers – the ones now showing shorts at festivals – daring to fail might be the key to success.

Correction

25 January 2013: The original version of this article misattributed Ian Pons Jewell’s video Helioscope to Ivana Bobic; her installation work has now been correctly labelled as Signals.

UnderWire: Supporting Women Filmmakers (Apicella, 2014)

2014-11-06-underwirewebsitepink.jpg
Image courtesy of UnderWire Festival

On Tuesday 11 November, the fifth UnderWire Festival will open at The Yard in Hackney Wick. Founded by Gemma Mitchell and myself in 2010 with the aim to foreground female filmmaking talent, the opening night’s screenings are always of the XX Award Category. Unique to UnderWire, films selected for this award are of women’s stories and feature female characters at their core.

Remembering the mixture of despair and cynical amusement at the hoard of PVC-clad, gun-wielding dominatrix characters vying (unsuccessfully) for selection on the shortlist in the first year, submissions are now filled with the golden roles we need more of from the mainstream!

Opening Night always creates a joyous atmosphere on which to begin this celebration of vital and original female voices making themselves heard in the UK film industry. Film after film presents women who are rarely shown, stories barely told, and views scarcely known: the night energises everyone present, and sets the tone for the week ahead perfectly!

2014-11-06-Still.jpg
Image courtesy of UnderWire Festival (Still from He Took His Skin Off For MeProducer shortlist)

Throughout the programme are stunningly diverse fiction, documentary and animation films. The festival has grown from six categories in the first year, to 10, recognising female talent in editing, cinematography, sound design, composing, writing, directing, producing, and acting, together with a special BFI Future Film Award for Under 25s.

Cast your eye over the recently announced nominations for the British Independent Film Awards, or for any major award ceremony over the past few years in fact, and you will see that women are rarely recognised for their contribution to film.

The excellent Melissa Silverstein on her blog Women and Hollywood does regular round-ups of the statistics, and they are far from pretty.

Of course it’s easy to get bogged down in all that’s wrong with the state of things, but that’s also a little boring too, so UnderWire has always ensured that it celebrates what’s brilliant, and from 11-15 November will be doing just that!

2014-11-06-OnLoop.jpg
Image courtesy of UnderWire Festival (Still from On LoopEditing shortlist)

The full programme is online, and screenings will take place every night, but there’s more: other highlights include the sensational DVD Bang which made a – well – BANG at Flatpack Festivals and has an exclusive selection of short films by East Asian women for rental in their micro cinema being set up especially for UnderWire: this truly has to be experienced to be believed! Euroscript and LOCO have partnered to produce a full training day for comedy writers, and will throw the doors open at the end of the day for a masterclass with a major comedy writing talent that I am not allowed to announce at the time of writing, but you’ll find out if you keep an eye on Euroscript, LOCO or UnderWire’s feeds. That evening LOCO’s LiveWire comedy event is an almost guaranteed sell-out so book ahead!

A personal highlight that is guaranteed to leave me even more evangelical about the power of film will be the Alumnae reunion on Saturday 15, where UnderWire will be welcoming back winners from previous years. A chance to get teary and emotional about the astonishing achievements of those who have become friends of UnderWire’s over the past five years. Several filmmakers have moved on to much larger projects, with one feature even being considered by the Oscars for next year’s short list, as I write.

2014-11-06-Caravan9.jpg
Image courtesy of UnderWire Festival (Still from Caravan 9Screenwriting shortlist)

Having shirked my responsibilities in favour of screenwriting almost immediately after the first year’s awards were over, I have little, if any claim to this amazing celebration of women’s filmmaking talent. That honour now resides with Chloe Trayner, who co-founder Gemma Mitchell entrusted with the task almost two years ago. Humble, passionate, skilled and incisive, Chloe has produced a festival that identifies some of the UK’s most exciting filmmaking talent, and you are all invited!

BIRDS EYE VIEW HISTORY (Birds-eye-view.co.uk, 2014)

HistoryHeader

Birds Eye View Film Festival was the vision of Rachel Millward and Pinny Grylls as a response to the industry numbers indicating that men directed 92% of films on general release.  They set out to create a festival that celebrated female filmmakers.

Starting out as a short film festival BEV has grown to become one of the most respected platforms for showcasing female film talent.

Talking at the time of the first event Rachel said ‘we decided to curate an event, and fill an hour with short films from emerging women filmmakers. The lack of female role models in film seemed to us to mean that we had to do something for ourselves.

We wanted to create a new platform for our peers. After a brainstorm in the café at Euston station, we came up with the name Bird’s Eye View (geddit) and got to work spreading the word. We posted on the then very primitive email list, Shooting People (thanks to Jess and Cath!) and put out a call for submissions, £5 per film to help us fund it all. I called up a gazillion companies asking them to advertise in the programme, and got Innocent Smoothies to give us product. Pin did the design. Here’s our very first flyer (featuring an old pic of Pin’s Mum dressing up Victorian style):

It was a sell out success! Queues around the block! And sure, there were plenty of our friends there, but there were also people from the UK Film Council, other filmmakers, producers, and even a couple of press. We were sky high with surprise, and shaking like leaves as we did our intro. Everyone seemed to love it. The films were great – we’d curated a fantastic mix of beautiful work – including Andrea Arnold‘s Dog, no less (little did we realise then how far she’d go!) and The Girl With the Red Dress starring Shirley Henderson, alongside a couple more arty turns including ours, of course!

The most exciting thing of all was that there was this immediate sense that there should be more of this. There was a need for it. No one else was specifically showcasing the work of women filmmakers at that time, and so I think at that point it was already clear that we might just have begun an Actual Thing. That might continue. And grow. And work.’

Three years later, Birds Eye View launched its international film festival in 2005, and over the next several years showcased some of the world’s best female filmmaking talent.

Premiere highlights have included Kim Longinotto’s Sisters in Law, Drew Barrymore’s Whip It, Lena Dunham’s Tiny Furniture, Lucy Walker’s Countdown to Zero and Wanuri Kahiu’s From A Whisper. Over 30 female musicians have been commissioned to create new live scores to classic silent films, including Imogen Heap, Bishi, Mira Calix and Natalie Clein.

Over the last 12 years BEV has developed a number of partnerships including events with Oxfam, Whistles, Southbank Centre and WOW Festival and media partnerships including Marie Claire and Moviescope. Guest speakers at the festivals have included Juliet Stevenson, Gillian Anderson, Zoe Wanamaker, Rosamund Pike, Hayley Atwell and in 2013, Jodie Whittaker who declared that ‘women are not a genre.’

BEV consistently champions female filmmakers and the need for equal representation behind and in front of the camera. In 2013 the festival had a specialist programme celebrating Arab female filmmakers including an International Woman’s Day preview of Wadjda by Haaifa Al-Mansour and the UK premiere of When I Saw You by Palestinian filmmaker Annemarie Jacir. The festival drew large audiences proving that international cinema of the highest quality has a place in the heart of film-goers.

2013 was the year that a new Creative Director, Kate Gerova, was appointed. She launched Filmonomics, a new film training programme for emerging filmmaking teams and co-developed Girls on Film Club, a film club in association with Shoreditch Sisters W.I group.

The information I have found out from all of this research is the opportunities available to female filmmakers in the UK. It has become apparent through statistical findings that there are not currently an equal number of male and female filmmakers getting their films made. This proves that there is a need for the organisations and schemes that have been set up in the UK, which are perhaps underexposed as many female filmmakers still struggle to make and distribute their films, which could perhaps be less of a problem if they took advantage of the schemes. I also learnt that there is a lot of emphasis on specifically female filmmakers while there aren’t any for men, which would appear on the surface to not be equal. However, men statistically do not have as much of a problem with getting their films made in the UK, and so these organisations and schemes are necessary. A lot of the statistics are to do with feature films in Hollywood, although the Independent film statistics show that there is still a problem with the smaller amount of women than men directing or producing films in the UK. There are theories on this ranging from pregnancy being a factor, to the sexist workplace, although it cannot completely be determined why women in the UK have not had as much success as they ideally would.

Reference List:

Apicella, G. (2014). UnderWire: Supporting Women Filmmakers. [online] The Huffington Post UK. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/gabriella-apicella/women-in-film_b_6117762.html [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

BFI, (2014). BFI Statistical Yearbook 2014. [online] Available at: http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/bfi-statistical-yearbook-2014.pdf [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Birds-eye-view.co.uk, (2014). History & People | Birds Eye View. [online] Available at: http://birds-eye-view.co.uk/about-us/history-people/ [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

British Film Institute, (2014). 10 great British films directed by women. [online] Available at: http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/news-bfi/lists/10-great-british-films-directed-women [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Coatman, A. (2014). Where the girls are: female filmmakers at the 10th London Short Film Festival. [online] British Film Institute. Available at: http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/sight-sound-magazine/comment/festivals/where-girls-are-female-filmmakers-london-short-film-festival-2013 [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Cochrane, K. (2010). Why are there so few female film-makers?. [online] the Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/jan/31/female-film-makers [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Directors.uk.com, (2014). Directors UK and BBC to pilot training for women directors. [online] Available at: http://www.directors.uk.com/about-us/news/directors-uk-and-bbc-pilot-training-women-directors [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Electric Sheep, (2011). Warped Women: The Emergence of Female Horror Directors in the UK. [online] Available at: http://www.electricsheepmagazine.co.uk/features/2011/03/07/warped-women-the-emergence-of-female-horror-directors-in-the-uk/ [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Hedditch, E. (2014). BFI Screenonline: Women and Film. [online] Screenonline.org.uk. Available at: http://www.screenonline.org.uk/film/id/824060/ [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Londonfeministfilmfestival.com, (2012). Statistics. [online] Available at: http://londonfeministfilmfestival.com/women-film/women-behind-the-camera/stats-to-go-under-wbtc/ [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Vincent, A. (2013). British film is booming but not for female directors – Telegraph. [online] Telegraph.co.uk. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/10197761/British-film-is-booming-but-not-for-female-directors.html [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Wftv.org.uk, (2013). BFI Statistical Yearbook Shows Decline in UK Female Writers and Directors. [online] Available at: http://www.wftv.org.uk/news/bfi-statistical-yearbook-shows-decline-uk-female-writers-and-directors-16203 [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Online Secondary Research- Organisations and Projects 2

ABOUT US (SWIFT – Savannah Women In Film & Television, 2014)

SWIFT is an organization of professional women from all realms of Film and Television.  SWIFT is dedicated to networking, collaborating, mentoring and attracting a wide variety of productions to Savannah.

Joining SWIFT

Benefits of membership:

  • Profile with resume on the SWIFT website

  • Access to private Facebook page

  • Monthly meetings with programs about film and television in Savannah.

  • Find out about projects coming to Savannah.

  • Networking with other female film professionals in Savannah.

  • Send us your resume with a minimum of 3 professional film and television credits. 

  • After review we will send you an acceptance e-mail with a link to our secure PAYPAL account.  

  • The fee for membership is $30 per year. 

(Lauzen, 2008) The Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film at San Diego State University is the most widely cited and trusted source of information on the representation of women in film and television. For more than a decade, researchers affiliated with the Center have provided individuals working in the entertainment industry and members of the public with extensive and forward-thinking research on the employment of women.

Scholars at the Center conduct an extensive agenda of original research documenting women’s under-representation and investigating the reasons for the continuing gender inequities.

Every year, The Celluloid Ceiling tracks the employment of women working as directors, writers, producers, cinematographers, and editors on the top grossing films. Another annual study, Boxed In, follows the employment of behind-the-scenes women in prime-time television. A new study, Independent Women, regularly monitors women’s behind-the-scenes employment on films appearing at high-profile film festivals in the U.S. Still other studies investigate the representation of women and men as film critics and writers (Thumbs Down); and compare the budgets, box office grosses, and DVD sales of movies made by women and men filmmakers (Women @ the Box Office).

Through its research and programs, the Center documents, explores, and celebrates the accomplishments of directors, writers, producers, cinematographers, and editors — who happen to be women — and encourages more women to pursue careers in these important storytelling roles.

 (Patterson, n.d.) A group for women filmmakers who want to work on film projects that create a positive image of women in the media. If you like the concepts of the following organizations and actively want to work on a film project to create social change then this is the group for you!
Anyone who wants to be an activist for change and work on our film projects. Producers, Directors, Videographers, Animators, Illustrators, Writers, Journalists, Social Media Activists, Voice Artists, Actors, Film Editors, Audio Artists, Musicians, Research and Data Entry Superstars

About

agnesfilms.com is named in honor of Agnès Varda, the French filmmaker who has been making women-centered fiction films and documentaries for over 50 years. Varda, in spite of the high quality of her work, remains an obscure figure to mainstream audiences around the world. This is not surprising, since the film industry is not always supportive of women who want to work behind—as opposed to in front of—the camera. According to the 2012 Celluloid Ceiling report, women comprised only 18% of directors, producers, writers, cinematographers, and editors in the 250 top-grossing films. A mere 1% increase since 1998, when Dr. Martha Lauzen began keeping track of women’s presence in film.

In an effort to provide support to emerging and established female filmmakers and to scholars interested in their work, our site aims to do the following:

• Foster a community of women filmmakers, scholars, instructors who teach film and filmmaking, and film lovers who support each other.  We hope to be joined by men who are interested in films made by women, as well as male filmmakers, scholars, and filmmaking/film instructors. Our aim is for our community to be diverse in terms of race, class, and sexual orientation.

• Shed light on the work of talented and committed women filmmakers working today, who, like Varda, don’t have the visibility they merit. We do this in the form of reviews of films made by women, and less often films by men featuring prominent female roles. We also have interviews with female filmmakers and through our featured member section we share narratives of the experiences women undergo as they stand behind the camera. We also discuss the history of women and feminist filmmakers through our critical analyses of past and current films.

• Provide a space where filmmakers and scholars come together to discuss their crafts and learn from each other, fostering project collaborations and strong connections between these two groups that don’t always find ways to intersect but have so much to gain from each other.

• Help women not trained in cinematic techniques be able to tell stories in this powerful medium.

• Showcase our members’ films and publications, as well as new developments in their careers.

Consider becoming a member (it’s free) and visit our contribution guidelines to learn about ways in which you can get involved with agnès films.

Thank you for visiting! Our staff welcomes you.

Women directors, take action! (Byrne, 2014)

Females First directors like Emily Kai Bock and Maja Borg tell Dazed why sexism in the film industry needs to change

020_web
Emily Kai Bock: “As a society, we need to be teaching young girls not to be spectators to boys”

Ninety-five per cent of Hollywood directors are men, according to the Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film, and so are most of their crews.

There are simply not enough films being made by women. We want to change that.

Today, Dazed Digital launches Females First, a video series funding and premiering new work from the best emerging female directors in the world, from art shorts and music videos to documentaries and fashion films. The subject matter will be bold and broad, and all will be created by women.

We asked future FF contributors Emily Kai Bock, Cathy Brady, Aoife McArdle, Destiny Ekaragha and Maja Borg to explain how they broke through and what needs to change. Head here to find out more about Females First.

“I’m convinced there are masterful filmmakers out there who for whatever reason can’t access filmmaking, and many of these are women. As a society, we need to be teaching young girls not to be spectators to boys. Also, not to be intimidated by technology. You don’t need a big crew to make a small film. I don’t want to silence male filmmakers who are speaking for a woman – I don’t feel like I can speak for all women, or that I can’t speak for a man – but I’d like to hear equal voices being heard. Women need to speak up and both men and women need to listen.”

“It’s easy to feel intimidated by this industry – it’s mostly made up of white middle-class men and that can make you feel like you don’t belong. Be aware of this but don’t carry it. Walk into that room like you’re supposed to be there, because if you’ve done the work, you are. Remember that.”

“My aim in my filmmaking is to focus on people who are usually not seen. Women and lesbians in particular have obviously existed throughout history, but their voices have been lost and silenced. We need to shine a light on them.”

“I can only talk from my experience, but I love seeing bold, intriguing, complex female characters onscreen. Certainly in cinema there are not enough female-driven stories. We need to see the full picture. For years we’ve been predominantly focused on ‘his story’. I want to understand and challenge ‘her story’.”

“Feature film is slowly changing in terms of its representation of women – Clio Barnard is fucking amazing – but it’s still shocking how few women realise they can be directors or DoPs. Watching Lynne Ramsay and Jane Campion films as a kid made me realise it was possible to be a director. I’d love to have an all-female crew, for instance, but that’s near impossible. This just makes no sense to me. We need to celebrate existing women filmmakers and inspire girls to get out and become cinematographers and directors.”

Keep checking here for more information about Females First, and check out our dA-Zed guide to female filmmakers and our list of ultimate female innovators in cinema

The information that I have found by looking at all of this information on projects and organizations, is that there is a need for organisations such as these considering the statistics behind why they have been set up. Many of the organisations have been set up years ago, although it seems as if there is potentially more need for them today than there have been in previous years, with the percentage of women working in the film industry dropping. However, there are many opportunites for women all around the world, from the organisations in the UK and US, to the international organisations that have been set up, and so if women were made more aware of these organisations and projects they could capitalise on that and maybe start getting more employment in the industry as filmmakers. It doesn’t seem completely fair at the moment that women have to pay to join a lot of these organisations, but it does offer networking and showcasing opportunities so it could be worth it.

Reference List:

Agnesfilms.com, (n.d.). About « agnesfilms: a site for female filmmakers. [online] Available at: http://agnesfilms.com/about/ [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Byrne, J. (2014). Women directors, take action!. [online] Dazed. Available at: http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/19551/1/women-directors-females-first-why-sexism-male-film-industry-needs-to-change [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Lauzen, M. (2008). Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film: SDSU. [online] Womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu. Available at: http://womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu/index.html [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Patterson, P. (n.d.). Women Filmmakers for Equal Representation in Film. [online] Meetup. Available at: http://www.meetup.com/Women-Filmmakers-for-Equal-Representation-in-Film/ [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

SWIFT – Savannah Women In Film & Television, (2014). SWIFT – Savannah Women In Film & Television. [online] Available at: http://www.savannahwomeninfilm.com/ [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Online Secondary Research- Organisations and Projects 1

What We Do

Welcome to the WFTV website

Women in Film & TV (UK) is the leading membership organisation for women working in creative media in the UK, and part of an international network of over 10,000 women worldwide.

Members of our organisation come from a broad range of professions spanning the entire creative media industry.

We host a variety of events throughout the year, present a glamorous awards ceremony every December, and run a mentoring programme for women in the industry. We also host networking evenings, collaborate with industry bodies on research projects and lobby for women’s interests.

Becoming a Member
Any female professional working in the film, television or creative media industry in the UK can become a member of WFTV (UK). This includes a broad range of occupations, such as director, writer, producer, actor, media lawyer, accountant, broadcaster, presenter, development exec, marketing and PR exec, journalist, technician, post production, distribution, senior exec, etc.

We have 2 types of membership, London and Country:
Annual London Membership is £100 + VAT, which works out at just £10 a month.
Annual Country Membership, for those who live anywhere in the UK outside the M25, is £50 + VAT, which works out at just £5 a month.

What are you waiting for? Join WFTV (UK). Still got questions? Try our FAQs or contact us.

I can’t recommend joining Women in Film & Television enough. As a young woman, still relatively new to the industry, WFTV has helped an incredible amount over the last few years with expanding my knowledge, my networking skills, contacts and confidence.”
WFTV Member, 2014

History of WFTV (UK)
In 1989, a group of women came together for the first official WFTV (UK) meeting. They were a mix of business executives, creatives and performers, including Linda La Plante, Dawn French, and Janet Street Porter. These were successful women who were fed up with the still male-dominated industry which demanded they be engaged in a constant struggle to be heard and respected.

They resolved to take positive action and follow in the footsteps of organisations in LA and New York, which had been established in the 70s, to support women working in the film and TV industries. They did this by creating a network of members and organising workshops, events, mentoring and awards to help them progress in their careers.

In 1990 the first Women in Film and Television Awards ceremony was held to recognise the achievements of some of the most successful women the industry could boast.

24 years on, the Awards is the largest annual celebration of women working in film, TV and digital media in the UK and has become a ‘must attend’ event.

The organisation has grown from being run by volunteers to having, 4 full-time members of staff, a busy programme of events and a well-respected Mentoring Scheme.

It’s the 21st Century! Do We Really Still Need an Organisation Like WFTV?

We wish it weren’t so but unfortunately industry statistics and the experience of our membership proves that there is as much need as ever for an organisation that supports women in the creative media industries to ensure they have equal opportunities and that their talents do not go to waste.

It’s a sad fact that, in 2011, women made up only 19% of writers of British films released in the UK, and only 15% of directors. In other areas of the industry, such as camera departments, sound, and lighting, the figures are even bleaker.

Women have come a long way and are achieving amazing things in the UK film, TV and digital media industries, but there’s still a long way to go and that’s why we’re here to help. (Wftv.org.uk, 2014)

Women directors come together to tackle industry issues

Beryl Richards, DUK Board Member updates us on the first meeting of our female directors group.

Last week the women on the DUK board got together to discuss our concerns about women directors working in the industry. It was great to sit in the same room with six other working women directors from both factual/documentary and drama and discuss what’s going on out there and what to do about it. The room was buzzing with lots of ideas!

Like me, my drama colleagues were worried that it seems like there are no more women directors working in drama than there were 20 years ago. In factual there are more, but there’s a big drop off after the age of 35.

There are some worrying figures out there, such as a recent study out of University of California showing the percentage of women directing features has fallen from 9% to 5% in the last 10 years.

We’ve also had lots of great feedback from our women members on email about what’s happening to them. From the emails sent to us it struck all of us how isolating it can be to face these issues alone.

What we are going to do next is some initial research to look at how many women are working as directors in the different sectors and genres of television and film. Firstly we are going to research our own Directors UK data to show where women are working, and augment this information with other published research. Once we know what we are dealing with, we can work out strategies to respond. Other plans include events to celebrate the work of women filmmakers in both TV and film, and helping support women through role models, mentoring and training.

Soon we are going to hold a public meeting that we urge you all to attend, so we can share and air some of what is going on out there. And please do write to us before then to add your voice by emailing Victoria on vmorris@directors.uk.com – all information will be treated confidentially.(Richards, n.d.)

   About Us (Women’s Film and Television History Network-UK/Ireland, 2011)

We are a group of researchers, teachers, archivists, collections managers, students, professionals, and enthusiasts engaged in exploring the contributions women have made to the emergence and development of film and television.

We have come together to form the Women’s Film & Television History Network-UK/Ireland as a means of encouraging, supporting and disseminating research into women’s participation in screen media, and exploring their wide range roles, including:

· scriptwriting · producing · directing · designing costumes, sets, props · acting, dancing, singing · cinematography · sound design & recording · editing · music · distributing · trade reviewing · exhibition & cinema managing · audiences & fans · journalism, criticism.

By raising the visibility of women’s present and past relationship to cinema and television we aim to:

  • ensure women’s work is recognised in the writing of screen histories.
  • make a case for the preservation and availability of women’s films and television programmes
  • increase programming choice in film theatres, television channels, DVD outlets
  • encourage new approaches to film and television that are sensitive to gender, class and race
  • impact on the teaching of screen media in schools and colleges
  • raise the aspirations of young women who might seek careers in the media.

WFTHN focuses on British and Irish women working in the UK/Ireland or abroad and on overseas women working here. It is affiliated to Women & Film History International and encourages British and Irish contributions to international initiatives such as the Women Film Pioneers Database, the biennial international Women and Silent Screen conferences and the women’s television conference, Consoling Passions.

WFTHN is not based in a single institution but collaborates with a range of professional and academic organizations, archival collections and websites relevant to women’s filmmaking and television production such as the Women and Silent British Cinema (WSBC) website, Screenonline, the British Film Institute, The Women’s Library, WiFT (UK) and so on.

History

The Women’s Film & Television History Network-UK/Ireland began as a small, informal Women’s Film History group, itself inspired by a wider international movement.

Traditionally film history has paid little attention to the contribution of women to film history – other than as actresses. But from its beginning women have been active in and around cinema as directors, scriptwriters, designers, cinema owners, distributors, publicists, reviewers, audiences, campaigners and so on.

Consequently in the late 1990s an International Women Film Pioneers Project was initiated in America to address this gap in historical knowledge.

Now based in the Film Division at Columbia University, New York, it is paralleled by the biennial Women and Silent Screen Congresses staged in different countries since 2000. These initiatives are supported by the umbrella organisation, Women and Film History International.

Till recently this work has had little impact in Britain. The Women’s Film History Network-UK/Ireland was therefore initiated to promote and support research into women’s filmmaking history in Britain and Ireland, from the silent period to the present.

The Network was guided through its infancy under the dedicated leadership of its founder member Professor Christine Gledhill and, with help from, especially, Professor Julia Knight and other key founder members, it gained momentum following a successful bid for funding from the Arts and Humanities Research Council to set up a Women’s Film History Network-UK/Ireland in 2009. The AHRC gave our proposal its highest grade and we gratefully acknowledge its recognition of this neglected area of women’s history. Equally we are grateful to the Centre for Research in Media and Cultural Studies at the University of Sunderland in giving this award an institutional home.

Although funds were limited, they supported four interdisciplinary Workshops staged between 2009-2011. These Workshops drew on Network members according to expertise to form small working parties to address the conceptual and organisational issues involved in establishing the Network’s long-term function and infrastructure. Over the course of the funding period, the Network developed its online presence through its Wiki site created by Alexis Weedon and via members’ own activities, such as the Women and Silent British Cinema website co-developed by Clare Watson and Nathalie Morris. In April 2011, the Network held its inaugural conference entitled Doing Women’s Film History: Reframing Cinema Past and Future (hosted and supported by the Centre for Research in Media and Cultural Studies at the University of Sunderland), the success of which is an encouraging indication of the interest and quality of research in this area of film and television history. In part due to the contributions made by television history scholars at this conference and through discussions held in the Network’s workshops, a motion was passed in the summer of 2011 to widen the Network’s key focus to include women’s television history.

The history of the Network’s founding Workshops (2009-2011), its earlier work around silent cinema, and its first international conference are recorded on its archival Wiki, at the Women and Silent British Cinema website, and the conference blog.

Today, to ensure continuing core activities of the Women’s Film & Television History Network-UK/Ireland, a steering group of self-funding volunteers have taken on particular responsibilities in pairs or small sub-groups for two years, meeting three times a year to review and co-ordinate support activities and new developments. Steering group membership is drawn from volunteers nominated at WFTHN general meetings held at the biennial Doing Women’s Film & TV History conferences. However, volunteers may offer help or be co-opted in the interim.

We warmly invite new members to join the Network and to get involved with its concerns and activities. To join WFTHN, click here.

(Wmm.com, n.d.)

Women Make Movies was founded more than 30 years ago to address the under-representation and misrepresentation of women in media.

According to the latest industry statistics, the fight goes on! Below are a few startling facts about the status of women in the industry, some heartening information from Women Make Movies, plus links to other great resources for the latest statistics, articles and opinions about women in the industry.

Film & Entertainment Industry Facts

    • “In 2013, women accounted for 16% of all directors, executive producers, producers, writers, cinematographers, and editors. This represents a decrease of two percentage points since 2012 and a decrease of one percentage point from 1998. – Celluloid Ceiling 2013 Report
    • “Women accounted for 10% of writers, 15% of executive producers, 17% of editors, 3% of cinematographers, and 25% of producers working on the top 250 domestic grossing films of 2013. – Celluloid Ceiling 2013 Report
    • “Women comprised 6% of all directors working on the top 250 films of 2013. This represents a decrease of 3 percentage points from 2012 and 1998. Ninety-three percent (93%) of the films had no female directors. – Celluloid Ceiling 2013 Report
    • 36% of films employed 0 or 1 woman in the roles considered, 23% employed 2 women, 33% employed 3 to 5 women, 6% employed 6 to 9 women, and 2% employed 10 to 13 women. In contrast, 1% of films employed 0 or 1 man in the roles considered, and 32% employed 10 to 13 men.  – Celluloid Ceiling 2013 Report
    • “A historical comparison of women’s employment on the top 250 films in 2013 and 1998 reveals that the percentages of women directors, writers, executive producers, editors, and cinematographers have declined. The percentage of producers has increased slightly.  – Celluloid Ceiling 2013 Report
    • “A historical comparison of women’s employment on the top 250 films in 2013 and 2012 reveals that the percentages of women directors, writers, executive producers, and editors have declined. The percentage of women producers has remained the same. The percentage of women cinematographers has increased slightly. Celluloid Ceiling 2013 Report
    • Only 11% of all clearly identifiable protagonists are female, 78% are male. – It’s a Man’s (Celluloid) World
    • “In Academy Award history, four female filmmakers have been nominated for best director (Lina Wertmuller-1977, Jane Campion-1994, and Sofia Coppola-2004, Kathryn Bigelow – 2010), but only Kathryn has won.
      Women’s E-News
    • “In 2013, during the 85th Academy Awards, across 19 categories 140 men were nominated for awards versus 35 women. There were no female nominees for Directing, Cinematography, Film Editing, Writing (Original Screenplay), or Music (Original Score). – Women’s Media Center
    • “9 percent of the top 250 movies at the domestic box office last year were made by female directors. That’s substantially higher than the 2011 figure of 5 percent. – NY Times Report
    • Diversity means money. Broadcast comedies and dramas with more diversity get higher ratings. Films with just 21-30% diversity earned a global median box-office total of $160 million, while films with less than 10% diversity made just $68.5 million. – Indiewire
    • Women are underrepresented by a factor of nearly 2 to 1 among lead roles in film; women had the lead in just 25.6% of the films. – Indiewire
    • Things are not moving in the right direction for women onscreen.  The numbers are stuck at around 30%, yet remember, women buy 50% of the tickets.  The numbers continue to show that Hollywood doesn’t care enough about women.  They believe that sexualizing girls and women sells tickets. – Indiewire
    • “Women support women. Films directed by women feature more women in all roles. There is a 21% increase in women working on a narrative film when there is a female director and a 24% of women working on documentaries. – Indiewire
    • Females direct more documentaries than narrative films – 34.5% vs 16.9%. – Indiewire
    • Top male critics wrote 82% of film reviews featured on Rotten Tomatoes during a two-month period, with top female critics accounting for less than 20%. – The Wrap

Facts About Women Make Movies

  • “WMM has more than 500 films in its collection, representing more than 400 filmmakers from nearly 30 countries around the globe.”
  • “In the last decade, WMM has worked with dozens of local women’s organizations in Asia, Latin America and the Middle East to support new International Women’s Film Festivals.”
  • Projects that WMM has supported and distributed have been nominated for and won all of the most prestigious media awards, including the Academy Award, Emmy Award, Peabody Award, and the duPont-Columbia University Broadcast Award, among others.
  • WMM now sponsors more than 200 projects in its renowned Production Assistance Program, and has helped filmmakers raise close to $4 million in funding over the last 5 years.
  • “WMM has returned more than $1.5 million in royalties to women filmmakers over the last three years.”
  • WMM serves as an advisor to pioneering projects around the world including: the Gender Montage Project which trains filmmakers in the former Soviet Republics; and a groundbreaking program developed to promote filmmaking in Iraq.
  • WMM films have been aired by major broadcasters around the world, including HBO/Cinemax, PBS, Sundance Channel, IFC and international broadcasters such as ZDF, Arte, KBS Korea and TV Globo Brazil.

The information I have put in quotation marks is intentionally such because backlogging wouldn’t work with bullet points, and so the quotation marks represent information and statistics that I find the most relevant.

About Women Make Movies

Established in 1972 to address the under representation and misrepresentation of women in the media industry, Women Make Movies is a multicultural, multiracial, non-profit media arts organization which facilitates the production, promotion, distribution and exhibition of independent films and videotapes by and about women.

The organization provides services to both users and makers of film and video programs, with a special emphasis on supporting work by women of color. Women Make Movies facilitates the development of feminist media through an internationally recognized Distribution Service and a Production Assistance Program.

Distribution Service

The Women Make Movies’ Distribution Service is our primary program. As the leading distributor of women’s films and videotapes in North America, Women Make Movies works with organizations and institutions that utilize non-commercial, educational media in their programs.

This includes media arts centers, museums, galleries, colleges and universities, as well as other non-profit organizations and agencies, ranging from hospitals to prisons to labor unions to the U.S. Army.  Our collection of more than 500 titles includes documentary, experimental, animation, dramatic and mixed-genre work. The films and videotapes represent a diversity of styles, subjects and perspectives in women’s lives. More than half of the works in the collection were produced by women of diverse cultures, and the collection includes a variety of works by and about lesbians, older women and women with disabilities.

In the last three years, WMM has returned more than $1.5 million to women producers in royalty payments. More info.

Production Assistance Program

Women Make Movies also offers a unique Production Assistance Program which provides fiscal sponsorship, low-cost media workshops and information services to independent media artists. The services included in this program reflect Women Make Movies’ commitment to outreach and development of both emerging and established women film and video makers. More info.

History

Women Make Movies was established in 1972 with the specific mission of training women to become film and video makers. Through the 1970s and early 1980s, hundreds of women participated in Women Make Movies’ training programs, collectively producing 70 films and videotapes. During the late 1970’s, in response to the lack of distribution and exhibition opportunities for women’s films, Women Make Movies initiated its distribution service, began presenting on‑going screenings in New York, and sponsored two international women’s film festivals.

In 1984, Women Make Movies exhibited a ground-breaking program of media by Latin American women, Punto de Vista: Latina, and the next year co-sponsored the conference Viewpoints: Women, Culture and Public Media with Hunter College, which was attended by more than 700 artists, practitioners, theorists, and community activists.

In 1988, a new production assistance program was initiated, which included artist-in-residencies, a technical assistance program and workshops. The following year, Women Make Movies launched two international touring programs, Changing the Subject: An International Exhibition of Films by Women of Color and The Feminist I, a survey of contemporary women’s video.

In celebration of our 20th anniversary in 1992, Women Make Movies launched a touring theatrical exhibition program of new releases from the Women Make Movies collection. The tour was presented in twenty cities throughout the United States. In addition, an international touring program from the Women Make Movies’ collection was launched at the Finnish Film Archives in Helsinki, Finland and traveled to a number of cities in Europe, Asia and Latin America.

In 1997, to honor Women Make Movies first quarter century, the Museum of Modern Art in New York City organized a special tribute and twenty-five program retrospective of Women Make Movies titles. Exhibitions commemorating the organization’s 25th Anniversary were also held in Austin, Salt Lake City, Boston, Atlanta, Washington DC, as well as internationally in Brazil, Mexico, Korea, Taiwan and the former Soviet Union.

Women Make Movies launched its 30th anniversary year at the Sundance Film Festival with a record breaking ten films, including the Special Jury Prize winner, Lourdes Portillo’s Señorita Extraviada in January of 2002.

This film, along with other highly acclaimed films from the WMM collection, were featured at exhibitions around the globe as part of our 30th Anniversary celebration.  For our 40th Anniversary in 2012 we worked with museums, art centers and other cultural institutions to present more than 40 exhibitions of the films we distribute.

Over the past decade, Women Make Movies distribution service has rapidly grown into an internationally recognized resource. WMM now distributes more than 500 documentary, dramatic and experimental films representing more than 400 emerging and established women artists.

Our films are shown in media arts centers, museums, television, theaters, libraries, universities and used by thousands of educational customers and community groups throughout the United States. WMM has also worked with dozens of local women’s organizations in Asia, Latin America and in the Middle East to support new International Women’s Film Festivals.

We are proud to have films in our collection by renowned filmmakers such as Jane Campion, Julie Dash, Sally Potter, Trinh T. Minh-ha, Lourdes Portillo, Tracey Moffatt, Valie Export, Kim Longinotto, Pratibha Parmar, Ngozi Onwurah and Ulrike Ottinger, among others, as well as films that have garnered top prizes at prestigious film festivals such as Cannes and Sundance. Our Production Assistance program continues to support the production and development of film and video projects. In the past four years over 200 projects were completed with the assistance of the Fiscal Sponsorship Program.   Projects that WMM has supported and distributed have won all of the most prestigious media awards including the Academy Award, Emmy Award and the Peabody Award, among others.    Recent successes from our Production Assistance Program include Parish, by Dee Rees, the E-Team by Katy Chevigny and Ross Kaufman, Gideon’s Army by Dawn Porter and Las Marthas by Cristina Ibarra.

In the coming years, Women Make Movies looks forward to continuing to increase the visibility of women both in front of and behind the camera.

Reference List:

Wftv.org.uk, (2014). What We Do. [online] Available at: http://www.wftv.org.uk/about-us/what-we-do [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Women’s Film and Television History Network-UK/Ireland, (2011). About Us. [online] Available at: https://womensfilmandtelevisionhistory.wordpress.com/about-us/about/ [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Wmm.com, (n.d.). WMM | RESOURCES | FILM FACTS. [online] Available at: http://www.wmm.com/resources/film_facts.shtml [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Richards, B. (n.d.). Women directors come together to tackle industry issues. [online] Directors.uk.com. Available at: http://www.directors.uk.com/about-us/news/women-directors-come-together-tackle-industry-issues [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Online Secondary Research- History of women in Film

Women have been central to the film industry since its inception in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. From Nickelodeons to full-length feature films and from silent films to talkies, as writers, directors, actors, and audience members, women have influenced the trajectory of the film industry. Female stardom was an essential component of the rise of the industry, though many of these women were celebrated more for their appearances than for their acting ability.

While the popularity of certain female stars offered them legendary status, the kinds of roles they were asked to play often reinforced traditional gender roles. That story is the familiar one. This exhibit intends to reveal a lesser known part of the story. Women actually played a powerful role in shaping the early film industry. As both consumers of film and professionals in the field, both in front of and behind the camera, women dramatically affected the development of American film.

Women Behind the Camera: Women as Directors
Prior to the 1930s, Hollywood provided many opportunities for women to work on films behind-the-scenes. Many studios had prominent female directors, and female screenwriters created some of the most popular movies of the period, while female film editors exercised creative control over the visual appearance of film. A few women even headed their own studios. Though these women earned their jobs through their creative talents and shrewd business sense, their presence behind-the-scenes helped legitimize film as an art form and as morally acceptable for audiences.

Alice Guy Blache
Alice Guy Blache directing her cast in 1915.
Library of Congress, LC-DIG-ppmsca-02978.
Like men, most female directors started their careers in other areas of the film industry before making their directorial debut. Alice Guy Blaché, for example, began as a secretary and rose to studio head. She is credited as being the first female film director, and also was known for experimenting with film technique and narrative form. She began her career in France at Gaumont Film Company, owned by Léon Gaumont, and directed her first film in 1896, where she directed all the films made by the studio until 1905.

She continued to work for Gaumont until 1907, when she married Herbet Blaché. After following him to the United States in 1910, she founded the Solax Company. As its president, she both directed and supervised production of the company’s films. In 1913 the company closed down, but Blaché continued to direct for her husband until 1922,

when she returned to France with her children after her marriage failed.
Though her career as a director faded, she is still remembered not only for being a pioneering woman in film, but for helping to shape the early film industry.7

Alice Guy Blaché also mentored Lois Weber, one of the most famous female American directors. Weber got her start under Blaché at Gaumont in 1908. Although Blaché initially hired her as an actress, Weber’s talent allowed her to develop a career behind the screen, as well as in front of the camera. Along with acting, she “wrote scenarios and subtitles, acted, directed, designed sets and costumes, edited, and even developed negatives for her films.”8 Along with her husband, Weber was also one of the first directors to experiment with sound.

Weber is also remembered for her skillful use of film to convey social messages. Weber’s 1914 Hypocrites, for example, used a nude statue to represent “the naked truth”—and she accepted the criticism she knew she would face because of this nudity. Much more daringly, Weber made a film about birth control, The Hand that Rocks the Cradle, in 1917.
This would suggest that women were more likely to experiment with new and controversial topics, challenging the way people thought at the time. It was also about aspects that are relevant and not offensive to them that may have been offensive to men, such as female nudity and birth control.
Women Behind the Camera: Women as Directors
Lois Weber at her piano
Lois Weber at her piano, which she had played since she was a young girl.
Her first step into the life of the famous was as a singer and piano player,
which she had perfected in her church choir.
Library of Congress, LC-DIG-GGBAIN-32125.

Weber’s position as a woman played a large part in allowing her to make films about risky subject matter. Just as theater owners courted female patrons to legitimize their businesses, the film industry sought female directors to legitimate the very product of film. Movies directed by women automatically carried greater moral weight. Therefore, directors like Weber could explore controversial topics under the guise of moral and social reform.

As a result, Weber could place nudes in her movies without fear of reprimand, while audiences watched such scandalous fare in the name of morality as opposed to mere titillation.
Because Weber came from the middle-class, had a “religious background,” was part of a stable marriage, and embraced “maternalist reform,” she was lent a moral credence that similarly elevated her films in the eyes of moralizing audiences. Weber returned the favor, “hiring other women to write or perform other jobs within her productions.”9
In 1915 Weber joined Universal Studios, and in 1917 she established Lois Weber Productions, with Universal working as her distributor. Unfortunately, most of the films that Weber made while on her own did not find critical or commercial success,
and when her husband and production partner Phillips Smalley left her, she closed her studio and returned to Universal. Weber’s career finally came to an end in the 1920s, with the advent of sound production.

Women Behind the Camera: Women as Directors
Grace Cunard
Grace Cunard, 1916.
Photoplay Magazine.

Lois Weber was not the only notable female director during film’s first decades.

Grace Cunard rose to fame by starring in numerous serials, but she also wrote many screenplays and directed a number of films in the World War I era. “Cunard’s depiction of strong action heroines,” notes Gwendolyn Audrey Foster, “marks an important, almost completely lost, cultural moment in which women were portrayed as active, clever, physically adroit warrior archetypes who were quite capable of saving themselves and others.”10
Paramount Studios also sought to capitalize on the ability of women to legitimize early film. Their star female director was Dorothy Arzner. Arzner began her career as a stenographer at Famous Players-Lasky, which later became Paramount. She was later promoted to film editor (a common job and stepping stone for women in the film business), and in 1927, directed her first film. When other female directors were pushed out of the business in the late 1920s, Arzner was the only woman who continuously directed films in the Hollywood studio system of the 1930s. 
She was known for her movies about spunky women, as well as her ability to bring out the best in the actresses she directed. After her retirement from directing in 1943, she worked as a professor of film at various universities.11

Women Behind the Camera: Women as Screenwriters
Frances Marion
While Frances Marion had a distaste for acting
in the films she wrote, fan magazines
of her time often expressed surprise
at her attractiveness. Many people
believed that screenwriters were
usually unattractive women who preferred
to be actresses, if their looks had allowed it.
USC Cinema-TV Library and Archives of
the Performing Arts.

Women were increasingly crowded out of directing positions in the 1920s and 1930s when the “professionalization” of film as represented in the formation of bodies such as the Screen Writer’s Guild “segregated the geography of Hollywood by sex.”12

These organizations modeled themselves on similar fraternal trade organizations and clubs that existed outside of Hollywood. Though these organizations and male-oriented attitude made it increasingly difficult for women to find work as directors, some still found work as screenwriters. 
Women had always been welcome in the writing departments of many of the studios because screenwriting was an anonymous job and because writing had long been an acceptable occupation for women. 

One of the most famous female screenwriters in American film history is Frances Marion. She was the highest-paid screenwriter of either gender in the 1920s and 30s and enjoyed great professional success. She was also the first woman to win an Academy Award unrelated to acting; she won Best Screenplay in 1930 for The Big House and in 1932 for The Champ. Another of her films, Dinner at Eight (1933), is considered a classic.

Frances Marion began her career in 1915 at Bosworth Studios as an assistant for Lois Weber, and often credited Weber as an inspiration. While Marion played small roles in some of Weber’s films, she also began writing, which she found to be her true calling. She wrote for many studios, but is best known for scripts she wrote for actress Mary Pickford, most notably Pollyanna (1920). The two developed a deep friendship, and Marion was responsible for many of Pickford’s roles. She also ghostwrote a fan magazine column for Pickford.

Women Behind the Camera: Women as Screenwriters
Anita Loos with John Emerson
Photograph of Anita Loos and John Emerson by Edward Steichen for Vanity Fair,
July 1928.

Truly supportive of other women, Frances Marion also is known for reviving the career of her friend Marie Dressler.  She wrote Min and Bill to feature Dressler, and the movie earned Dressler the 1931 Academy Award for Best Actress.  As a result, Dressler went on to long-term stardom as Tugboat Annie

Another female screenwriter, Anita Loos, became nationally known for writing Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1925), a novel she had written that she adapted for both the stage and screen. By 1925 she had written some 200 scripts for silent movies and co-authored two books on film production.

She was especially recognized for the scenarios she wrote for famous actor Douglas Fairbanks, as well as for the Talmadge sisters, Norma, Natalie and Constance. Golden stars of their time, the sisters were fortunate to have Loos’ irreverent writing as captions on the silent screen.

Her comedic scripts often contained a deep underlying cynicism and satire, much of it based on gender roles.

Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, for example, was based on Loos’ experience with esteemed literary critic H.L. Mencken, who joined his male friends in ignoring her—a well-paid fellow writer—to focus on an inane blonde.

Both Loos and Marion used professional names that they did not change with marriages and divorces, and both continued their careers despite changes in marital status.  Loos went on to find uncommon success, even during the Great Depression, when she earned as much as $2,500 a week.

Women Behind the Camera: Women as Screenwriters
Poster for The Great Moment written by Elinor Glyn
Movie poster for “The Great Moment,” written by Elinor Glyn, released in 1921.

Another screenwriter known for adapting her own novels is Elinor Glyn.  Glyn was a scenario writer, but is mostly known for writing

It (1927), the film that made Clara Bow a star and turned the female archetype of the “It Girl,” an iteration of the 1920s “New Woman,” into a national obsession.
It was based on an article that Glyn wrote for Cosmopolitan about the qualities that defined a modern woman. Glyn described “it” as “that quality possessed by some which draws all others with its magnetic force. With ‘IT’ you win all men if you are a woman—all women if you are a man. ‘IT’ can be a quality of the mind as well as a physical attraction.”13

The image of the “It Girl” came to be closely associated with that of the “the flapper”—sexually liberated, defiantly modern, and independent.

Women On Screen: Women at the Academy Awards
Oscar statuette
The Oscar statuette is the copyrighted
property of the Academy of Motion Picture
Arts and Sciences. ©A.M.P.A.S.®

The Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences was founded in 1927 with Douglas Fairbanks as the first president. The first awards ceremony was held in 1929, evaluating the films for 1927-1928. Janet Gaynor was the first woman to win the award for best actress for her roles in Seventh Heaven (1927) and Street Angel (1928). The fact that motion pictures had set up an academy and began awarding performances and productions indicates that film was finally taken seriously as an art form. The best supporting actor and actress categories were not created until 1936 so in the early years of the awards there was only one category specifically set aside for women. Other actresses that won in the early years of the award ceremony were Mary Pickford in 1930 for her role in Coquette (1929), Norma Shearer for The Divorcee (1930), Marie Dressler for Min and Bill (1930), Helen Hayes for her role in The Sin of Madelon Claudet (1931) and Katharine Hepburn for her role in Morning Glory (1932).


By the time of the first Academy Awards, women directors had already been pushed out of many behind the scenes roles and were therefore notably absent from the awards outside of Best Actress. One exception is Frances Marion who won an award for Best Writing Achievement for her film The Big House (1930) and became the first woman to win an award for an achievement other than acting.
(Nwhm.org, 2014)
The information that I have learned from this research is that the invention of film initially gave women many opportunities to be creative, and it was even a good thing to be a female filmmaker at first, as it allowed films to be more controversial and more allowing for morals in films. However, with the invention of the Hollywood System women got pushed out from their roles in film as film became a more professional industry, unsuitable for a woman. In spite of this, some women managed to make it in the film industry, but the fact that these women are so notable shows how rare it was.

Women Filmmakers and Directors (Foster, 2014)

The history of women filmmakers is a rich and fertile body of knowledge that has been largely ignored, until recently, by mainstream film historians. Nevertheless, women were very much involved in the creation of the visual art form known as motion pictures from its beginnings until the present.

In fact, women were at one time far more prominent in film production circles than they are now.

In the early days of film, women such as Alice Guy, Gene Gauntier, Hanna Henning, Ida May Park, Olga Preobrazhenskaya, Nell Shipman, Ruth Stonehouse, Lucille McVey Drew, Elvira Notari, Lois Weber, Dorothy Arzner, Germaine Dulac, Marie Epstein, Grace Cunard, and many others were involved in creating the new visual format.

Unfortunately, when the first surveys of film history were written, and when the first pantheons of directors and major players were drawn up, most of the accomplishments of women directors, producers, and scenarists were overlooked. Even feminists tended to believe that there simply were no women involved in the production end of early films; women were viewed as objects of a voyeuristic ?male gaze,? in films that were supposedly all directed and created by men.

Women were written out of history as active participants in the production and creation of film, film movements, special effects, the star system, the studio system, independent and experimental forms, and genres. It seems as if historians were primarily interested in women in front of the camera as actors and sex objects. Creative women, however, were very much participants in the history of filmmaking.

For example, Alice Guy, a French woman director, is generally credited as having directed the first ?narrative? film. Her film, La F?e aux choux, is in many ways a film like that of her male contemporaries; it tells the story of a fairy tale in which a woman who cannot bear children creates them in a cabbage patch. Guy was instrumental in the development of such early pioneering techniques as special effects (masking, superimposition, and other in-camera effects). She was also very much a pioneer of the very first genre vehicles, yet Alice Guy is rarely cited as the originator of these genres. The hundreds of films she directed include everything from melodramas to gangster films, horror films, fairy tales, and even short music films featuring famous opera singers?forerunners to today?s music videos.

It is hard to overestimate the talented contributions of this pioneering woman director who worked in early primitive color techniques such as handed painting and stamping and also created some of the first examples of sound films, recorded on wax cylinders.

And Alice Guy was not by any means the only woman producer/writer/director to contribute to the development of the film form. Internationally, many other women, most of whom are barely remembered today, were also prominent in silent-film production.

For example, in Australia, the McDonagh sisters (Paulette, Phyllis, and Isobel) taught themselves filmmaking from the vantage point of actresses. Their early films were only recently ?rediscovered? and written back into Australian film history.

Hanna Henning, a German director who made many silent films, awaits rediscovery, as does Ida May Park, an American director who made scores of films in the silent-film period. The years have been a bit kinder to Lois Weber, Cleo Madison, Dorothy Davenport Reid, and Dorothy Arzner, all of whom have had their films survive and who have been rediscovered and celebrated in film festivals and archival retrospectives such as those at the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the American Museum of the Moving Picture in Astoria.

Women directors thrived during a short period in the beginning of filmmaking production, especially in the teens and early 1920s. In this period, before film directing was seen as primarily a ?masculine? occupation, women directors were numerous and busy.

This period is well covered by Anthony Slide in his book, Early Women Directors. So many women were active in film production: Julia Crawford Ivers, Nell Shipman, Ruth Stonehouse, Lottie Lyell, Musidora, Margery Wilson, and many others.

Many women were employed at the Universal Studios, where Carl Laemmle was not averse to hiring women as directors. Women were also highly active in this period as screenwriters.

Many women directors of color worked outside the studio system as independent producer/directors. African American women directors such as Eloice Gist and Zora Neale Hurston developed and introduced the independent personal film. Gist was a preacher who wrote, produced, directed, and self-distributed her own films; she lectured with them as she went from town to town, speaking with films such as her Hellbound Train, which depicted the narratives of figures bound for hell because of various moral trespasses.

Zora Neale Hurston, as many now know, pioneered the ethnographic film that featured the insider informant. Hurston?s films were ahead of their time in that she understood the value of herself as an insider informant in the stories she told about the African American community.

Beyond the United States, women were instrumental in pioneering schools of film. Women such as French filmmakers Germaine Dulac and Marie Epstein were groundbreakers in the experimentation with film.

Dulac is now finally hailed as one of the champions of the experimental French film. She was loosely associated with the Surrealists, the Impressionists, and the poetic realists. Her films are currently championed and lionized as part of a canon of important experimental films that challenged the borders of poetic filmic expression.

Epstein is also being reconfigured into the landscape of film history. Her pioneering and mastery of poetic realism, combined with her narrative techniques, are finally being included in film history. Agn?s Varda, the Belgian woman director who helped pioneer the New Wave, is also finally being credited for her contribution to the development of the new school of filmmaking previously only attributed to directors such as Fran?ois Truffaut, Jean-Luc Godard, and other male directors. In Italy, as Giuliana Bruno uncovered, the early silent filmmaker Elvira Notari was already beginning to embrace the artistic precepts behind Neorealism, a school of film that arose in Italy many years after her death.

By the 1930s there were fewer and fewer women directors. Film was beginning to be viewed as an art form and as a powerful medium in the marketplace. Many women directors left the field when it was clear that society no longer approved of women working in such a high-profile job that clearly indicated power in the public sphere.

Among the exceptions were German director Leni Riefenstahl, who is universally credited with pioneering the documentary form and the technique of propaganda.

Dorothy Arzner, a lesbian filmmaker, was one of the few prominent women directors in the 1930s. Mary Field is credited with pioneering the British nature film at about this time.

Mary Ellen Bute was one of the pioneers of the experimental film in the United States. Her use of oscillated light to form patterns choreographed to music was far ahead of its time.

The 1940s were a fertile time for experimental women filmmakers. In this era, Maya Deren and Marie Menken introduced many of the ideas and forms of experimental avant-garde cinema. In Britain, Joy Batchelor created animated films. In France, Jacqueline Audry directed glossy studio-produced films. In the Soviet Union, Wanda Jakubowska pioneered many of the Soviet ideals of the social document film. In Mexico, Matilde Landeta fought to direct her own productions after having served as an assistant director for many, many years. She managed to direct a few of her own projects despite the sexism of the industry.

In the 1950s, Ida Lupino claimed that she did her work simply because there was no one else available, but the passion of her efforts belies such modesty. She tackled controversial subject matter and invented many of the techniques and themes associated with film noir.

In the 1960s many women directed personal experimental films.

Mai Zetterling, for example, began as an actress, but soon tired of working within the confines of a male-dominated system, and created her own visions of the world. Sara Aldrege was another important innovator in experimental film. One of the greatest of the experimental directors of the 1960s, Carolee Schneemann deals with issues of sexuality, power, and gender, as does Barbara Hammer, who began working as a director in the early 1970s.

The multiplicity of visions among women directors is startling; it forces us to look at ourselves as women, and as members of society, in a series of entirely new and enlightening ways.

In the 1970s, 1980s, and the 1990s, there has been an international rise in the number of women filmmakers, both independent and studio directors. Women have been prominent as filmmakers in both developed and developing countries. Despite the rise in the number of women filmmakers, the auteur film director continues to be thought of as male.

Despite women?s contributions to the development of the art form and many of its pivotal movements (from Surrealism to New Wave to documentary and the personal film), women filmmakers continue to be marginalized in dominant discourse. Women filmmakers, through their exclusion from history books, have been denied a sisterhood. Each generation of women filmmakers stands apart from its earlier predecessors. Remedying the paucity of scholarship on women directors is compounded by an unavailability of many of the films made by women in the early days of cinema, many of which have been lost, neglected, or destroyed. Film scholars have produced a remarkably persuasive body of film criticism that begins the belated recognition process of women film directors and their achievements.

Despite a clear lineage, women filmmakers have managed to be influenced by one another, even if they have been marginalized or excluded from film scholarship. Barbara Hammer and several women directors credit, for example, the work of Maya Deren, whose experimental films were profoundly personal and expressed a female camera-eye. Diana Barrie claims she was most influenced by Deren?s Meshes of the Afternoon. Alice Guy was a mentor and influence on Lois Weber, who followed in her footsteps to produce, write, and direct her own material. Weber, in turn, had a profound effect upon the career of Dorothy Arzner, who had a successful directorial career within the confines of the studio system of Hollywood in the 1930s.

Dorothy Arzner, however, admitted she stifled her criticism of other filmmaker?s studio projects. As the only woman director in the studio system, she felt she ?ought not complain,? and yet she carefully maintained that no obstacles were put in her way by men in the business. Elinor Glyn, the famous author and early filmmaker, seemingly did not recognize the clearly sexist critical lambasting she received for her adroit and sharply observed comedy, Knowing Men.

Ida May Park, another woman among many who directed in the 1920s, refused her first job directing, thinking it an unfeminine job. Even contemporary women directors find the notion of a feminist approach to filmmaking incompatible with their need for acceptance in the industry.

The recently deceased Shirley Clarke refused invitations to women?s film festivals, even if she agreed that women directors should be recognized. French filmmaker Diane Kurys finds the idea of women?s cinema ?negative, dangerous, and reductive,? at the same time claiming, ?I am a feminist because I am a woman, I can?t help it.?

Other women directors make absolutely no excuses for their feminism. Carolee Schneemann, Yvonne Rainer, and Barbara Hammer, for example, make films that deal directly and uncompromisingly with issues of sexuality, power, and gender. Donna Deitch was primarily motivated to make Desert Hearts because she saw a lack of films?especially commercial films?that center around a lesbian relationship. Hammer was drawn to experimental formalist filmmaking precisely because it did not seem to be (yet) the exclusive domain of men.

Some women directors wish to make films that employ newly defined heroines or that reverse gender expectations.

Sally Potter?s The Gold Diggers is a case in point. Michelle Citron?s Daughter Rite consists of a narrative about two sisters and their mother and ignores the trappings of heroism. Doris D?rrie?s film Men . . . is an attempt to see men as comic gender reversals of the mythic Marilyn Monroe type. Social concerns are also prevalent in the films and voices of women directors. Barbara Kopple?s American Dream covers union battles. Marguerite Duras, a French critic and writer, and Trinh T. Minh-ha, a Vietnamese deconstructionist critic and documentarian, are centrally concerned with deprivileging the screen from its power to distort social reality. Trinh T. Minh-ha questions the ability of the image itself as a historicist account of truth. Clearly then, women directors are often compelled to redefine the boundaries of cinema.

Women directors face a lack of support not only as a result of their gender, but also because they have a remarkable tendency to choose ?controversial? or ?difficult? subject matter.

Shirley Clarke had enormous difficulties funding The Cool World, an early 1960s experimental film (shot in 35mm) about racism and drug dependency. British feature director Muriel Box faced similar difficulties proving herself in a male-dominated industry.

Jodie Foster and Penny Marshall stand as proof that some women manage to find funding and support from Hollywood executives, but both have had to use their acting as leverage in the decision-making process.

Racism in Hollywood is a problem only compounded by sexism against women of color. The new African American ?wave? of feature filmmaking is predominated by men such as Spike Lee and John Singleton. African American women directors such as Julie Dash, Kathleen Collins, Alile Sharon Larkin, and Barbara McCullough have so far not been offered lucrative package deals by industry executives. Similarly, Asian American women directors have had major difficulties finding funding and distribution. Christine Choy faced enormous interference and lack of support in the production of her film Who Killed Vincent Chin?, a film about violence and racism directed against Asian Americans. Kathleen Collins spent more than a year trying to fund her film Women, Sisters, and Friends.

Julie Dash continues to have to search aggressively for funding, even after the critical success of her Afrocentric Daughters of the Dust. Claire Denis was forced to face humiliation and scorn when attempting to finance her independent feature Chocolat, a film that directly attacks African colonization. Similarly, Ann Hui?s Boat People, a critically successful film that documents the harsh realities of Vietnamese refugees, clearly deserves wider distribution. Distribution and finance remain as formidable barriers that independent filmmakers find themselves up against.

An unbelievable amount of hardship seems to have been suffered by women directors, yet an unrivaled degree of perseverance seems to be a common factor in many of their experiences. Early pioneering film director Dorothy Davenport Reid faced the resentment of her male colleagues as she struggled to create her own cinematic visions of the woman?s plight in American society.

Yet Reid went on to make a series of intensely personal films that argued against drug addiction, prostitution, and sexism. Yvonne Rainer recently managed to fund a film about menopause, Privilege, despite its supposedly taboo subject matter, because of an incredibly loyal following and an intense determination to make the film. For all of these women, the need to make films is a fierce desire they must simply obey, no matter the cost.

Whether working in the industry or making films with the aid of grants and personal financial subsidies, women filmmakers have helped to shape the world of film as it is today. Some women film practitioners see themselves as harbingers of change, instructional forces, barometers of social reintegration; other women see themselves as workers within a tradition that they attempt to subvert from within. The immense contribution made by these women is a legacy that is rich in personal insight, hard work, careful study, and often sacrifice to achieve the aims they held for their creative endeavors.

The information that I have found from this source helped to back up what I found on the last source and add more to it. For example, it helped in finding out about some more women filmmakers outside the Hollywood system who found their niche in directing more experimental, independent films. I also found out that some women could have been filmmakers but put the emphasis on themselves that it was not a typical female occupation and so stood in their own way, as they were worried about being looked down on my men at the time. Another aspect I found backed up something that my questionnaires showed, in that often female directors are mostly famous solely because they have been actresses first and established their contacts that way.
Reference List:
Nwhm.org, (2014). Women in Film. [online] Available at: https://www.nwhm.org/online-exhibits/film/25.html [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].
Foster, G. (2014). Women Filmmakers and Directors | Film Director | Movie Director | Film Directors | Movie Directors | Filmmaker | FilmDirectorsSite.com. [online] Filmdirectorssite.com. Available at: http://www.filmdirectorssite.com/women-filmmakers-directors.html [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Online secondary research- History of women filmmakers: Alice Guy-Blache

The First Woman Behind a Camera, Now Forgotten
Hardly anyone remembers Alice Guy-Blaché, the first female movie director. Now filmmaker Pamela Green—who calls Guy-Blaché the Mark Zuckerberg of her time—is on a mission to get Alice’s story on the silver screen.

She wrote, directed, or produced more than 1,000 films. At age 23, she was one of the first filmmakers to make a narrative movie. She pioneered the technology of syncing sound to film. She created the first film with an all African-American cast. And she was the first woman to build and run a film studio.

Any idea who she is?

If not, you’re far from alone. A majority of people—even Hollywood directors, actors, and producers—have never heard of her.

Alice Guy-Blaché was the world’s first female director. She was one of the most innovative moviemakers of her time—doubly remarkable because she was a woman who succeeded in a solidly all-male world.

But Guy-Blaché remains forgotten by many in the movie industry. Filmmaker Pamela Green wants to change all that. Her movie in the making, Be Natural, is a product of nearly two years of research on Guy-Blaché’s life and legacy. The movie is supported by a host of Hollywood bigwigs, including Robert Redford as executive producer and Jodie Foster as narrator, plus Catherine Hardwicke, Jon Chu, Julie Delpy, Cheryl Hines, Sir Ben Kingsley, and Marc Wanamaker.

But Green, along with her co-director Jarik van Sluijs, are far from finished with their research—which is why they created a Kickstarter to fund the project. Donations are accepted only until August 27, and they’ve reached only a fraction of their goal so far.

Arguably, Guy-Blaché changed the format of filmmaking forever. “We think of her as like a Mark Zuckerberg,” Green says. “The technology was there, but she took it further by figuring out a way to connect with the audience through her storytelling.”

She was active in France from 1896 to 1907 and in the United States from 1910 to 1922, Green says. And by utilizing a narrative technique, Guy-Blaché was able to accomplish something completely unique for the time.

“She understood that telling a narrative story in film was going to require following the perspective of a singular character, and it took a good 10 years for other filmmakers to figure out exactly what she did,” Alison McMahan, a filmmaker and film scholar, says in one of the movie’s Kickstarter videos.
Video screenshot

Guy-Blaché’s narrative roots probably started as a child, Green says, because she grew up as the daughter of a bookseller. She became a secretary to Leon Gaumont, of France’s Gaumont Studios, where she witnessed demonstrations of the 60mm and 35mm cameras. She asked Gaumont if she could experiment with the new technology.

It was a perfect fit. “[Guy-Blaché] sees a box as an opportunity to tell stories, and she asked her boss for permission if she can go film something … She went out there and did it. And they told her, ‘Oh, this is a silly girlish thing, but go ahead.’ She didn’t stop,” Green says.

In 1896, The Cabbage Fairy (La Fée aux choux) became Guy-Blaché’s first film. That first foray led to hundreds of short films for Gaumont Studios, where she was eventually made head of production. When Gaumont relocated her husband and cameraman Herbert Blaché to New York in 1907, she opened her own studio, Solax, which was located first in Flushing, Queens, and then in Fort Lee, New Jersey. Solax released two or three films every week—and Guy-Blaché directed most of them herself. Even Alfred Hitchcock was a fan. She was so ahead of her time, Green says, that she even made a movie called In The Year 2000, When Women Are in Charge. By the time of her death in 1968, she had produced more than 1,000 films. However, due to distribution and wear-and-tear of old film, she knew the whereabouts of only three of her movies, according to Green. Now, about 150 of her films have been found.
130820-Vogt-Kickstarter-film-embedBe Natural

Guy-Blaché received France’s Legion of Honor in 1953 and Director’s Guild of America Lifetime Achievement Award in 2012,

so why isn’t Guy-Blaché more of a household name in Hollywood? That is one of the questions that Green is investigating. She says there are numerous reasons for Guy-Blaché’s near erasure from history: “History is written by men … The role of the director wasn’t really defined back then … and she was a woman—that’s automatic.”

The film’s title, Be Natural, reflects what Guy-Blaché told her actors when directing them—to “act natural,” which was dramatic for the time. She even had signs with the mantra in Solax studios, Green says.

Despite the 100-year difference, Green and van Sluijs, who started PIC Agency in Hollywood, think they have much in common with Guy-Blaché. “We built this company from scratch, and that’s why we respect Alice, because she went ahead and built a company from scratch. It’s very hard to stay in business—it was hard for her then; it’s hard for us now,” Green says.

When asked how she nabbed big names like Redford and Foster to support Be Natural, Green says, “How did Alice do it? You go out there and you ask people.”

Green wants Be Natural not only to pay homage to Guy-Blaché and her work, but also to be an inspiration for future generations of filmmakers. Green says the movie, which will have both 2-D and 3-D CGI renderings of early 20th-century locations and technologies, will fully immerse viewers into Guy-Blaché’s world.

“This story is not only an amazing example for women, it’s an amazing example for an entrepreneur, and it’s a great way to get a grasp of what really went on in cinema from a modern perspective—not just some boring history lesson,” Green says. “We want people to be emotional as well and experience the beginnings through this woman’s eyes and see the future … through going back in time and standing next to her.” (The Daily Beast, 2013)

Source 2:

Alice Guy Blaché: Lost Visionary of the Cinema

by Alison McMahan

Alice Guy Blaché (1873-1968), the world’s first woman filmmaker, was one of the key figures in the development of narrative film. From 1896 to 1920 she directed hundreds of short films (including over 100 sychronized sound films and twenty-two feature films), produced hundreds more, and was the first – and so far the only – woman to own and run her own studio plant (The Solax Studio in Fort Lee, NJ, 1910-1914).

However, her role in film history was completely forgotten until her own memoirs were published in 1976.

This new book tells her life story and fills in many gaps left by the memoirs. Guy Blaché’s life and career mirrored momentous changes in the film industry, and the long time-span and sheer volume of her output makes her films a fertile territory for the application of new theories of cinema history, the development of film narrative, and feminist film theory. The book provides a close analysis of the  over one hundred Guy Blaché films that survive, and in the process rewrites early cinema history.(Aliceguyblache.com, 2014)

Backing up this information to more than one source shows that it is not made up for the purposes of the first website. It also backs up the dates given when Guy-Blache produced her films, so that I know this is correct. All of the blockquoted information is what I would have otherwise highlighted to annotate if I was using paper instead of creating a blog online (being that WordPress won’t allow plugins for highlighting words). Also, the second source adds another book that I can look at to my research, as it provides more information on Guy-Blanche. However, it is possible that i wouldn’t need too much more information, as the focus of my infographic will not solely be on this one woman, or indeed the history of women in film, but on a range of aspects from the history to the statistics in media now. If I was to create one solely on the history of women in film this would be an extremely useful resource.

Reference List:

The Daily Beast, (2013). Alice Guy-Blache: The First Woman Behind the Camera. [online] Available at: http://www.thedailybeast.com/witw/articles/2013/08/20/alice-guy-blach-hollywood-s-female-pioneer.html [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Aliceguyblache.com, (2014). Alice Guy Blaché: Lost Visionary of the Cinema | Alice Guy Blaché. [online] Available at: http://www.aliceguyblache.com/lost-visionary/home [Accessed 30 Nov. 2014].

Identifying Online Resources

From an initial list of links found from typing in related words on Google to the subject I am studying, I have narrowed it down and organized the resources I will be using for information. I will go into more depth with them now that they have been identified, meaning I will find and note down the useful information from these pages. They are:

History

Information about the first female filmmaker backed up to 2 sources:

Alice Guy-Blaché

http://www.thedailybeast.com/witw/articles/2013/08/20/alice-guy-blach-hollywood-s-female-pioneer.html

http://www.aliceguyblache.com/lost-visionary/home

History female directors:

http://www.filmdirectorssite.com/women-filmmakers-directors.html

https://www.nwhm.org/online-exhibits/film/index.html

Organisations

Organization for Women In Film and TV

http://www.wftv.org.uk/about-us/what-we-do

http://www.wftv.org.uk/resources/reports-and-statistics

http://www.wftv.org.uk/resources/reports-and-statistics/what-percentage-film-crew-female

Organisation for all directors (not just women) in the UK:

http://www.directors.uk.com/about-us/news/women-directors-come-together-tackle-industry-issues

Women’s film Network UK and Ireland:

https://womensfilmandtelevisionhistory.wordpress.com/tag/women-filmmakers/

Organization with statistics:

http://www.wmm.com/resources/film_facts.shtml

Organisation in Savannah USA

http://www.savannahwomeninfilm.com/

US Organisations:

http://womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu/research.html

http://www.meetup.com/Women-Filmmakers-for-Equal-Representation-in-Film/

Worldwide organization/”community”:

http://agnesfilms.com/

Project set up to help female directors:

http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/19551/1/women-directors-females-first-why-sexism-male-film-industry-needs-to-change

UK

Female horror directors UK:
http://www.electricsheepmagazine.co.uk/features/2011/03/07/warped-women-the-emergence-of-female-horror-directors-in-the-uk/ – includes 2 examples

Feminist Film Festival:

http://londonfeministfilmfestival.com/women-film/women-behind-the-camera/stats-to-go-under-wbtc/

Equality? BBC training female directors:

http://www.directors.uk.com/about-us/news/directors-uk-and-bbc-pilot-training-women-directors

UK fall in women filmmakers BFI stats (backed up to another source and actual report):

http://www.screendaily.com/news/women-film-directors-writers-decrease-in-uk/5058549.article

http://www.wftv.org.uk/news/bfi-statistical-yearbook-shows-decline-uk-female-writers-and-directors-16203

http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/bfi-statistical-yearbook-2014.pdf

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/10197761/British-film-is-booming-but-not-for-female-directors.html (BFI report in Guardian article)

http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/bfi-report-on-female-writers-and-directors-of-uk-films-2013-11.pdf (BFI women directors in film)

Article in 2010 saying no woman had ever won an Oscar for directing:

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/jan/31/female-film-makers

BFI info on women directors in the UK:

http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/news-bfi/lists/10-great-british-films-directed-women

http://www.screenonline.org.uk/film/id/824060/

Positive news about women’s progress (film festival):

http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/sight-sound-magazine/comment/festivals/where-girls-are-female-filmmakers-london-short-film-festival-2013

Film festival specifically for women filmmakers:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/gabriella-apicella/women-in-film_b_6117762.html

http://birds-eye-view.co.uk/

US

Report on the status of Women in US Media

http://wmc.3cdn.net/6dd3de8ca65852dbd4_fjm6yck9o.pdf

America Hollywood stats:

https://www.nyfa.edu/film-school-blog/gender-inequality-in-film/

Stats in Hollywood over the last few years:

http://blogs.indiewire.com/womenandhollywood/statistics

Around the World

 Canada women filmmakers article:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/women-filmmakers-call-for-gender-equity-in-male-dominated-industry-1.2800029

http://www.thetelegram.com/Living/Entertainment/2014-10-17/article-3907372/Filmmakers-want-gender-equality/1

Nordic Film Industry (backed up to 2 sources):

http://www.nikk.no/en/news/the-nordic-film-industry-remains-male-dominated/

http://www.nordicom.gu.se/en/about-nordicom/pressreleases/nordic-film-industry-still-dominated-men

Arab women filmmakers stats more promising than the UK or US:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-21969940

Hong Kong women filmmakers;

http://www.independentcinemaoffice.org.uk/films/visible-secrets?p=1

http://travel.cnn.com/hong-kong/none/chat-hong-kongs-female-directors-661577

Germany female filmmakers info:

http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/onlinessays/JC27folder/FemFilmGermanySilbmn.html

Women filmmakers in Europe (not good): http://www.filmdirectors.eu/?p=3393

Stats

Online article:

“ But what are they writing about? The report notes that back in the mid-1990s, women were making more top movies than they are today. (As if we needed more grist for the mill of 90s nostalgia.) In 2013’s top-grossing movies, women accounted for only 16 percent of important positions behind the scenes, including directors, writers, executive producers, producers, cinematographers, and editors. Likewise, in one television category, forward movement has been so incremental as to be nearly immeasurable: “the number of episodes directed by white men fell from 73 percent to 72 percent.” Progress? Only a percentile.

Unsurprisingly, this bad news behind the scenes has had an effect on what appeared onscreen. Female actors in the top 2013 films garnered barely more than a quarter of the speaking roles and narration opportunities. On the other hand, in those films where women did have roles, actresses received “more roles with speaking parts and fewer gigs zeroing in on their sexuality.” http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2014/02/24/numbers-dont-lie-white-men-still-dominate-media/

What percentage of a film crew is female?

Useful stats articles:

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/jan/15/women-in-film-industry-celluloid-ceiling

(backed up stats from this: http://variety.com/2014/film/news/employment-of-women-in-film-production-dips-below-1998-levels-1201055095/ )

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/jul/22/gender-bias-film-industry-75-percent-male

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/may/06/women-film-independent-hollywood-cate-blanchett-study

Women Directors examples

Women film directors article:

http://www.metacritic.com/feature/best-women-film-directors-and-movies

Most exciting female directors of 2013:

http://www.indiewire.com/article/heroines-of-cinema-the-10-most-exciting-young-female-directors-in-the-world-today

 

Feminist Filmmaking

http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2014/08/ICA_feminist_Wiki-a-thon

http://www.tft.ucla.edu/mediascape/Fall08_Warren.html

http://feministfilmfestivaldublin.com/


Not Relevant

Men in media, but only about journalism so not relevant:

http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/mar/04/women-national-newspapers

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/style/wp/2014/05/20/is-journalism-really-a-male-dominated-field-the-numbers-say-yes/

About documentaries so not relevant:

http://girltalkhq.com/female-filmmakers-creating-a-social-change-movement-thru-documentaries/

Libraries

This is the first part of the second assignment, in which I am looking up which libraries would be plausible to access resources relevant to my subject from. When looking on Google at the libraries in Barking and Dagenham, these are the ones that are shown:

 Barking Library

Robert Jeyes Community Library

Robert Jeyes Community Libary, will be a  volunteer staffed service in Chadwell Heath Community Centre.  The Centre will open on 29 September 2014

Valence Library

Valence Library is currently undergoing some redevelopment work.  The library is open as usual, but there may be some disruption while the works are carried out.  (Lbbd.gov.uk, 2014)
Geographically, the nearest of these libraries to me is the Dagenham Library, located in Heathway, which I know as I have been there before. However, the Valance Library is also near to me, although it is a much smaller library. I will go to the Dagenham Library next week if I can, and see if they have any relevant books on women filmmakers. This seems like it might be unlikely for such a specialist subject, so if they do not have any I could ask how long it takes to order it in.
Another option is to go to the British Library and see what sources are available there. As it has been suggested that we go on a trip there over the coming weeks, this does sound like an equally plausible option. As well as this, I have also searched the British Library’s resources on their website, and have found that 103 results come up when looking for books related to “women filmmakers” (Explore.bl.uk, 2014). With this list of books, I can see if any match up to the identified useful ones I have already looked at online, and decide prior to going what I want to look at.
Reference List:
Lbbd.gov.uk, (2014). Local libraries. [online] Available at: http://www.lbbd.gov.uk/LeisureArtsAndLibraries/Libraries/Pages/LocalLibraries.aspx [Accessed 23 Nov. 2014].

Why

This, and the other blog posts, are online because I will be investigating a subject of my choice as part of a HND course I am currently studying in Creative Media Production. Were I to choose another topic I could have further looked into the technologies of films, or historical significance of some aspect of film. However I have chosen this specific topic as I believe that while others may be at least equally relevant, this topic seem as if it is going to be interesting to research. I have also chosen it because I know that there is a wide variety of resources out there that I could use, both online and in terms of books. I also thought that it would be a good topic to get primary research for, as it may be possible to get an interview about the topic, although if this falls through it is simple enough to design some questionnaires about the topic, then collate the results and see what they say about it.

Vocational Relevance

I am doing this simply because, as I female filmmaker, I think it will be an interesting topic to research. I recently read somewhere that the first female Oscar winner was in 2010, which seems slightly behind the times. This may be because men simply have happened to have more Oscar-worthy ideas up until that point, or it may have been a clue that there is something worth researching in terms of the opportunities woman have had in the film industry. Another example is the word “cameraman” which is still widely used, and often the non-gender based term “camera operator” can be an afterthought, which seems like a habit passed down from the days where women were unlikely to be operating a camera. I believe that this is relevant to me as someone who is currently studying media and making films, and one day hopes to work in the industry. This is because it is important to discover how equal the opportunities are, and interesting to learn about how the opportunities may have changed over the years. It is also possible that one of the organizations for women in the film industry may put my info graphic on one of their websites to promote their cause, which would be beneficial for me vocationally as it would also help get my work out there.

Availability of Research Materials

There are many research materials available online, as I feel like I have identified in other sections of this blog. For example, there are many websites that I can find by simply typing words to do with the topic into a search engine such as Google. I can search for historical filmmakers and how that is in terms of female influence, I can search for the current numbers of women in employment in the media, I can search for a lot of information on info graphics regarding what is out there, and how to make one, and much more. These websites can be accessed by one of many computers I have already identified, or by purchasing one. As well as this, there are books in existence to do with women working in the media, such as Women Directors and their Films by Mary G. Hurd. There are other books out there that can be found either by going to the library and if they don’t have the materials needed requesting they order in the books, or by going to book shops. If neither of these are possible, it is possible to buy the books online. As for the primary research, I needn’t worry about the availability of materials, as I would be designing my own interview questions and questionnaires.